From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 20 Aug 2001 16:21:18 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Boxer Opposes Closure Proposal |
Earlier this month (August, 2001) California Senator Barbara Boxer sent a brief letter to local government officials in California, opposing the Defense Department's proposal for a new round of military base closures. Instead, Boxer - now chair of the Senate Environment Committee's Superfund subcommittee - proposed that the military "focus its energy and resources on cleaning up the bases it has already closed." Here is the text of her letter: *** Senator Barbara Boxer on the Pentagon's Plan for Base Closures I am writing to tell you of my strong opposition to the Pentagon's recent proposal to close more military bases in the United States. This proposal is bad news for California, and you can count on me to work with my colleagues in the Senate to prevent additional base closures from going forward. California has already endured more than its fair share of previous base closures. Under the Pentagon's proposal, an independent commission would examine all domestic military bases, choose which bases to close and announce recommendations in 2003. The Pentagon announced that it would seek to close up to 25 percent of all U.S. military installations. Californians know the devastating effects of past closures because we took a disproportionate hit in previous base closure rounds. Of the 97 major military installations closed nationwide since 1988, 29 were in California. That's 30 percent of all major facilities closed. California's counties and cities are all too familiar with the serious impact of closed military facilities on local communities. Jobs are lost, small businesses close down and what is left is infrastructure that is difficult to reuse. In many cases, environmental contamination makes large tracts of land off limits until decades of cleanup are complete. To date, while some progress has been made, none of those 29 closed California bases have been fully cleaned up or converted to productive civilian use. According to the Governor's Base Closure Advisor, California needs $200 million each year for the next 20 years in order to pay for all the necessary cleanup. By the Pentagon's own estimates, some California bases won't be fully cleaned up until 2050. Rather than pursue another painful round of military base closures, I believe the Pentagon should focus its energy and resources on cleaning up the bases it has already closed. I would be happy to hear your thoughts on military base closures or other issues facing us. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Digest 8/16/01 Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Boxer Opposes Closure Proposal | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Digest 8/16/01 Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Boxer Opposes Closure Proposal |