2001 CPEO Military List Archive

From: Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@cpeo.org>
Date: 25 Sep 2001 20:57:18 -0000
Reply: cpeo-military
Subject: [CPEO-MEF] House Proposal, National Security Amendment to NEPA.
 
[Following is an analysis we received of Section 312 of the House Defense Authorization Act.
--Aimee]

The House version of the '02 Def Authorization bill (see below) contains a
proposal to amend NEPA by requiring SecDef to include a detailed evaluation
of the impacts on national security in any EIS or EA where SecDef or the
Department is the preparer or a cooperating agency. The authors of this
legislation should be complimented for crafting such a broad waiver of the
sovereign immunity of the United States for national security matters.
Without this legislation, efforts to obtain judicial review of the national
security implications of DoD activities would be difficult. The foreign
affairs and national defense authority committed to the President and the
Executive Branch by the Constitution create strong separation of powers and
deference arguments in favor of judicial restraint in considering such
cases. But of equal value in the defense of a judicial attack on national
security activities is the lack of a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the
United States , a position frequently and successfully asserted by DoJ on
behalf of SecDef.

This legislative proposal, however, will open the door to judicial
challenges, because the SecDef , if this passes, will have the affirmative
obligation to address, in detail, the impact on readiness, training, testing
and operations of the proposed action and each alternative. A failure to do
so or an allegation that it was not performed in sufficient detail , under
well established interpretations of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA),
will be reviewable in a federal court. The APA is a waiver of the sovereign
immunity of the United States. By attaching this provision to the
requirements of NEPA, Congress will give courts more authority to review
national security activities than presently exists. While I would expect the
deference argument to dictate the results of most challenges, the mere
spectre of judicial consideration of the adequacy of the Secretary's
"detailed evaluation" should cause the national defense establishment to
hesitate giving support to this initiative. The time and expense to perform
the evaluation, the risk of exposure of classified information and the
potential for mischief by those who would disrupt our military's
capabilities are too great to allow this legislation to be given serious
consideration. Kill it and let's get on with the important business facing
our nation.

Barry Steinberg
********************************************************************************************

SEC. 312. NATIONAL SECURITY IMPACT STATEMENTS.
(a) EVALUATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY IMPACTS REQUIRED.--(1) Chapter 160 of
title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2710, as
added by section 311, the following new section:``§2711. Environmental
impact statements and environmental assessments: evaluation of national
security impacts of proposed action and alternatives
``(a) AGENCY ACTION.--Whenever an environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment is required under section 102 of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) to be prepared in
connection with a proposed Department of Defense action, the Secretary of
Defense shall include as a part of the environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment a detailed evaluation of the impact of the proposed
action, and each alternative to the proposed action considered in the
statement or assessment, on national security, including the readiness,
training, testing, and operations of the armed forces.
``(b) AGENCY INPUT.--The Secretary of Defense shall also include the
evaluation required by subsection (a) in any input provided by the
Department of Defense as a cooperating agency to a lead agency preparing an
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment.''.
(2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by
adding at the end the following new item:
``2711. Environmental impact statements and environmental assessments:
evaluation of national security impacts of proposed action and
alternatives.''.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.--Section 2711 of title 10, United States Code, as added
by subsection (a), shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this
Act and apply with respect to any environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment prepared by the Secretary of Defense that has not
been released in final form as of that date.



Please note new phone number and address below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aimee R. Houghton                                 
Associate Director, CPEO
1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC  20036
tel: 202-452-8039; fax: 202-452-8095
Email: aimeeh@cpeo.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




  Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Urgent: National Security Impact Statements
Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Amendments in SASC Bill Dropped
  Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Urgent: National Security Impact Statements
Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Amendments in SASC Bill Dropped

CPEO Home
CPEO Lists
Author Index
Date Index
Thread Index