From: | Aimee Houghton <aimeeh@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 25 Sep 2001 20:57:18 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] House Proposal, National Security Amendment to NEPA. |
[Following is an analysis we received of Section 312 of the House Defense
Authorization Act. --Aimee] The House version of the '02 Def Authorization bill (see below) contains a proposal to amend NEPA by requiring SecDef to include a detailed evaluation of the impacts on national security in any EIS or EA where SecDef or the Department is the preparer or a cooperating agency. The authors of this legislation should be complimented for crafting such a broad waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States for national security matters. Without this legislation, efforts to obtain judicial review of the national security implications of DoD activities would be difficult. The foreign affairs and national defense authority committed to the President and the Executive Branch by the Constitution create strong separation of powers and deference arguments in favor of judicial restraint in considering such cases. But of equal value in the defense of a judicial attack on national security activities is the lack of a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States , a position frequently and successfully asserted by DoJ on behalf of SecDef. This legislative proposal, however, will open the door to judicial challenges, because the SecDef , if this passes, will have the affirmative obligation to address, in detail, the impact on readiness, training, testing and operations of the proposed action and each alternative. A failure to do so or an allegation that it was not performed in sufficient detail , under well established interpretations of the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), will be reviewable in a federal court. The APA is a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States. By attaching this provision to the requirements of NEPA, Congress will give courts more authority to review national security activities than presently exists. While I would expect the deference argument to dictate the results of most challenges, the mere spectre of judicial consideration of the adequacy of the Secretary's "detailed evaluation" should cause the national defense establishment to hesitate giving support to this initiative. The time and expense to perform the evaluation, the risk of exposure of classified information and the potential for mischief by those who would disrupt our military's capabilities are too great to allow this legislation to be given serious consideration. Kill it and let's get on with the important business facing our nation. Barry Steinberg ******************************************************************************************** SEC. 312. NATIONAL SECURITY IMPACT STATEMENTS. (a) EVALUATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY IMPACTS REQUIRED.--(1) Chapter 160 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2710, as added by section 311, the following new section:``§2711. Environmental impact statements and environmental assessments: evaluation of national security impacts of proposed action and alternatives ``(a) AGENCY ACTION.--Whenever an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment is required under section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) to be prepared in connection with a proposed Department of Defense action, the Secretary of Defense shall include as a part of the environmental impact statement or environmental assessment a detailed evaluation of the impact of the proposed action, and each alternative to the proposed action considered in the statement or assessment, on national security, including the readiness, training, testing, and operations of the armed forces. ``(b) AGENCY INPUT.--The Secretary of Defense shall also include the evaluation required by subsection (a) in any input provided by the Department of Defense as a cooperating agency to a lead agency preparing an environmental impact statement or environmental assessment.''. (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ``2711. Environmental impact statements and environmental assessments: evaluation of national security impacts of proposed action and alternatives.''. (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.--Section 2711 of title 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and apply with respect to any environmental impact statement or environmental assessment prepared by the Secretary of Defense that has not been released in final form as of that date. Please note new phone number and address below.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aimee R.
Houghton
Associate Director, CPEO
1101 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20036
tel: 202-452-8039; fax: 202-452-8095
Email: aimeeh@cpeo.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Urgent: National Security Impact Statements Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Amendments in SASC Bill Dropped | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Urgent: National Security Impact Statements Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques Amendments in SASC Bill Dropped |