From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 12 Dec 2001 19:10:58 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Base Closure Authority in Defense Act |
The following summary of the base closure provisions in the Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2002, as reported by Conference Committee, is from a December 12, 2001 House Armed Services Committee press release available at http://www.house.gov/hasc/pressreleases/2001/01-12-12confsummary.html Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Authority. The conferees approved the President's request for a round of base closures, but with revised procedures to create a fair and objective process that places national security as the principal objective, closes loopholes, and ensures that BRAC decisions support military force structure and strategy. Furthermore, the conferees agreed to delay the BRAC round until 2005 to ensure that the U.S. economy has time to recover, DOD has time to define its military strategy and requirements, and the federal government and U.S. military have time to adjust budgets so that up-front BRAC costs do not damage military modernization, readiness, or personnel requirements. Details of the process are as follows: In February 2004, the Secretary of Defense must submit to Congress a detailed force structure plan, including end strengths and major combatant units (e.g., Army divisions, Navy ships, Air Force air wings), an infrastructure inventory that supports future U.S. military needs; The Secretary of Defense must compare the force structure and infrastructure inventory, and certify that proceeding with base closures is necessary and justified. He must also certify that his recommendations for base closures will result in annual net savings for each of the services by 2011. Failure to do so will stop the BRAC process; The President, in consultation with the congressional leadership, will appoint nine members of the BRAC Commission, who will convene in March 2005; In May 2005, the Secretary of Defense must submit to Congress, the BRAC Commission, and the Federal Register a list of bases and facilities to be closed; The BRAC Commission will assess and may modify the plans of the Secretary of Defense. In September 2005, the commission will submit to the President a list of closure and realignment recommendations; and Upon receiving the list, the President will have 15 days to accept or reject the commission's entire list. If the President approves it, Congress will have 45 days to approve or reject the entire list. If the President rejects the list, the BRAC Commission will have 30 days to consider the President's objections, make adjustments to the list, and resubmit the list to the President. Upon receiving the resubmitted list, the President will have another 15 days to approve or reject it. If approved, Congress will have 45 days to approve or reject the entire list. While the BRAC process approved by the conferees is similar to previous base closure rounds, there are a number of important changes, including: "Military value" must be the primary evaluation factor to be used in the base closure process; "Military value" is defined in detail to ensure that valuable training land, air, and sea space are not sacrificed for short-term budgetary pressures, and that military readiness, strategy, and training requirements are protected; DOD and the BRAC Commission must consider the extent and timing of costs and savings, the impact of potential environmental remediation costs, and the impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military installations when making closure and realignment decisions; DOD may place closed bases into caretaker status (rather than disposing of them) if those facilities may be needed in the future for national security purposes or it is otherwise in DOD's interest; The BRAC Commission may not add any military facility to the list of facilities to be closed under the Secretary of Defense's infrastructure plan unless a super-majority (seven of the nine commissioners) agrees to do so. In contrast, the commission may remove a base from the closure list by a simple-majority vote; and Loopholes in past BRAC legislation that allowed the decisions to be politicized have been eliminated. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 lsiegel@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Sustainable Range Management - a community view at APG Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques legislation | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Sustainable Range Management - a community view at APG Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Vieques legislation |