From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 7 Jan 2003 20:14:27 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Rocket fuel pollution strains water supplies, prompts health fears |
California Rocket fuel pollution strains water supplies, prompts health fears ANDREW BRIDGES, AP Science Writer Sunday, January 5, 2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (01-05) 22:31 PST LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A toxic chemical used to fuel Cold War-era missiles and the rockets that put man on the moon has left a legacy of contamination across the Southwest, where it pinches the region's already tight supply of drinking water. The chemical, called perchlorate, pollutes much of the lower Colorado River -- the main water source for 20 million people across the Southwest -- and has forced the shutdown of hundreds of wells in California. State and federal officials are still debating how much risk perchlorate poses when ingested and what limits should be set for the chemical, a process slowed partly by lawsuits filed by defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin Corp. that worry they could be on the hook for billions of dollars in cleanup costs. Thousands of people have sued the companies that once made or handled perchlorate, alleging years of drinking water laced with the chemical have caused cancers and other illnesses. Adrienne Wise-Tates, 46, has had tumors of the brain and ovaries, multiple cysts in her breasts, cancerous cells found when she had a goiter removed and, most recently, an unknown mass in her left kidney. The mother of three blames the perchlorate-tainted water she drank while growing up in Redlands. There, 70 miles east of Los Angeles, nearly 1,000 people are suing Lockheed Martin over perchlorate pollution associated with a former rocket engine testing facility that closed in the 1970s. "I played in the water, drank the water, everything. The normal things a child does," Wise-Tates said. "Since it was so much in this area, in the water, that's what I attribute it to." Lockheed spokeswoman Gail Rymer said the company is "vigorously" defending itself against the claims. "We do not feel that anyone was harmed or has been made ill as a result of our operations at the former Lockheed Propulsion Co. site," Rymer said. The oxygen-rich chemical interferes with the way the body takes iodide into the thyroid and can disrupt how the gland regulates metabolism. It's unclear how much is dangerous. This article can be viewed at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/01/05/national1314EST0485.DTL ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Epidemiology for Dummies Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate's risks clear, but not at what levels | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Epidemiology for Dummies Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate's risks clear, but not at what levels |