From: | dzweifel@earthlink.net |
Date: | 13 Jan 2003 23:55:49 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Rebuttal re Navy's 25mm Phalanx DU Contamination |
To all interested parties: There comes a time when one cannot continue sit idly by & see erroneous information from any particular source posted on the Military-Environmental Listserve without an in-kind response. I would like to take this opportunity to state a few facts that have been passed along to me by what one could depict as military weapons experts. I've witnessed live-fire demonstrations at Camp Pendleton,CA of USMC LAV/Light Armored Vehicles discharging 25mm GE Chain-Gun DU rounds that are practically identical to the ammunition the CIWS/Close-in Weapons System or "Phalanx" fires. One of these empty shell casings is sitting on my desk as I write this & has been for the last 10 years & yours truly is still in relatively good health for a 62 year old clapped-out veteran. The facts are that as long as the rounds/slugs have left the chamber of the weapon there is no danger whatsoever of any contamination. So the claim that the DD/Destroyer USS Fife is a contaminated ship which includes her ship's company is absolutely ludicrous & fallacious. Only those rounds that actually penetrate & vaporize are hazardous. Therefore the vast majority of the Fife's Phalanx rounds could be considered undetonated/non-hazardous unless they happened to hit a target that was dense enough to trigger detonation/ignition. However on the other hand re the issue of safety, when the rounds in question collide with a significantly solid object & begin to vaporize then all bets are off. A case in point was during the Iraqi/Kuwaiti conflict/'90-91 Gulf War. All damaged or destroyed armor subject to these 25 & 120 mm DU Abrams tank rounds were significantly irradiated with alpha & beta radiation. Which caused this detritus of war to be quite radioactive when one was within close proximity to the vehicles in question. The technical sources I queried stated categorically that airborne beta ionizing radiation from detonated DU rounds is only particularly dangerous if you're within approximately 20 feet & down-wind of them & directly inhale the radio actively ionized particulate matter/dust particles. On another note of special interest is that everyone within the above mentioned TO/Theater of Operations was warned to stay clear of these carcasses but few heeded this directive because of the almost universal desire for souvenirs Therefore one could probably surmise that there was quite a bit of radiation sickness after the fact. But unfortunately the vast majority of their resultant ailments weren't sufficiently diagnosed as such at that time. My son was a primary gunner on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle in the aforementioned conflict & he's also a victim of the "Gulf War Syndrome." His track or vehicle wasn't irradiated but his crew most assuredly was because they wanted to see the damage they had wrought up close. In summation may I state that the unfired rounds are not intrinsically dangerous because the DU/Depleted Uranium core is still encapsulated within the unfired steel alloy shell of the slug itself. So being around stored ammunition is not significantly hazardous per se but they certainly are very hazardous if the slugs happen to have ignited & you're within the AOC/Area of Concern. Don Zweifel MCAS Tustin & MCAS El Toro RAB charter member P.S.: Do not speak for the USAVR/US Army Volunteer Reserve, Lenny. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Navy May Close Puerto Rico Base : Washington Post,Jan. 11, 2003 Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] PRESS RELEASE: Safe Alternative to Army Burning Sought | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Rules on Environment Concern Pentagon, WashingtonPost Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] PRESS RELEASE: Safe Alternative to Army Burning Sought |