From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Jan 2003 22:17:41 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] TOXIC RESIDUE FOUND AT CLOSED CAMP BONNEVILLE |
This is an editorial in response to an article below. This is an Excerpt, and you have to pay for the full story: TOXIC RESIDUE FOUND AT CLOSED CAMP BONNEVILLE ERIN MIDDLEWOOD, Columbian staff writer January 2, 2003; Page c1 Section: Clark County/region Article ID: 2003002019 -- 468 words A plume of groundwater at CampBonneville contains a toxic residue from rocket fuel that's at the center of a debate in the federal government over safety levels. Ammonium perchlorate interferes with the thyroid gland, which can lead toGraves' disease or formation of tumors, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA and the Pentagon can't agree on a safe level of perchlorate in groundwater, delaying establishment of a national standard for drinking People who want the entire article and/or editorial will have to pay. To find them, go to http://www.columbian.com/archives/index.html and conduct a 2003 search for "perchlorate." LS Article that the above editorial is in response to: _From The Columbian - Clark County/region Published: 01/05/2003 Page: c6 Editorial OPINION: IN OUR VIEW -- SURPLUS PROBLEMS: Groundwater contamination complicates Camp Bonneville's prospects Byline: Columbian editorial writers When the Pentagon in 1995 added Camp Bonneville to the list of military facilities slated for closure, local officials reacted with glee that a 3,800-acre chunk of mostly undeveloped land in the heart of Clark County was about to be given away. Eight years later, nothing has changed hands. And the potential public asset has begun to look more and more like an expensive liability. The latest bad news is the confirmation that a toxic chemical, ammonium perchlorate, has contaminated the groundwater beneath the former military training site. That's certain to complicate the process of turning Camp Bonneville over to the county for eventual use as a regional park. As The Columbian's Erin Middlewood reported last week, the chemical, a component of solid rocket fuel, has been detected in preliminary groundwater tests at Camp Bonneville at levels ranging from 13 to 199 parts per billion. That's lower than the Department of Defense's suggested limit of 200 parts per billion but many times the 1 part per billion that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency believes is actually safe. So far, no contamination has been detected in drinking water wells surrounding the camp, but if and when it does show up, the ramifications could be serious. Despite the disagreement between Pentagon and EPA officials over safe levels of the chemical, scientists have known since the 1950s that ammonium perchlorate blocks the absorption of iodine in the human thyroid gland, which can cause tumors and disease, particularly in fetuses and children. Army officials say they plan to remove a landfill thought to be the source of the chemical. But cleanup of groundwater after it has been contaminated is notoriously difficult. Even in surface waters, ammonium perchlorate is proving to be a stubborn problem: One plume of the toxin that has contaminated drinking water and irrigation supplies in the Los Angeles basin was found to have originated more than 400 miles up the Colorado River, at a munitions plant above Hoover Dam. "It will probably take decades for the dilution effect to flush it all out," Douglas Zimmerman, an environmental regulator in Nevada, told The Wall Street Journal last month. The Pentagon is paying for some, but not all, of the ammonium perchlorate decontamination across the nation. Certainly the work to remove the chemical from Camp Bonneville, like steps to take away unexploded ordnance and other hazards, must fall primarily to the Defense Department. Although Army officials say the landfill was used by local law enforcement over the years for fireworks disposal, the disassembly of rocket motors by the Air Force at the site is probably the primary cause of the contamination. Camp Bonneville is still an asset worth pursing but not one worth accepting in a hazardous condition. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Shooting range protest grows: from Arizona Daily Sun Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Next Round of Base Closings Article | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Shooting range protest grows: from Arizona Daily Sun Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Next Round of Base Closings Article |