From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Mar 2003 18:59:13 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Cornhusker plant testing water |
Nebraska Cornhusker plant testing water Tests are looking for presence of explosive residue in groundwater Last modified at 11:44 p.m. on Tuesday, March 11, 2003 By Mike Bockoven mbockoven@theindependent.com For the members of HydroGeoLogic Inc., a group testing wells around the Grand Island area, a unique problem has presented itself. "If there's no water, you can't really test it," said Robert Overfelt, project manager for the company. "Some of the shallow wells are dry, so we won't sample them, obviously." Out of the 142 wells the group will sample during the annual groundwater testing for the Cornhusker Army Ammunitions Plant near Grand Island, eight have no water in them or so little that testing isn't possible. The group, which began sampling last week, will take three weeks to finish its work and roughly three weeks to get the results back on the water in the wells. One of the main concerns is RDX, an explosive residue that has been detected in groundwater near CAAP since the mid-1980s. The chemical was used when the plant was in production from 1942 to 1973. RDX is present along a plume of groundwater stretching north and east from the plant, with a few spots along the way. As with many previous years, Overfelt said, he and his crew expect to find no sharp increase or decrease in the amount of RDX along the plume, although the amounts have decreased over time. "The plume over the years has reduced somewhat," he said. "In general, the trends show us there have been reductions. You may not see that from year to year, but when you look over the long term, you can see it." The drought that struck Central Nebraska last summer won't have a large effect one way or the other on the testing, he said. However, it was reported last fall that, while the RDX plume was decreasing in size and scope, officials had seen an increase in RDX readings on the grounds of the former plant, located west of town. This article can be viewed at: http://www.theindependent.com/stories/031203/new_testing12.shtml ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Committee endorses plan to set up Sunflower redevelopment author Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Committee endorses plan to set up Sunflower redevelopment authority | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Bush Seeks Liability Shield On Perchlorate Pollution Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Committee endorses plan to set up Sunflower redevelopment authority |