From: | info@cswab.com |
Date: | 19 Mar 2003 15:03:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Emissions from Badger Burning 5 Times Higher Than Disclosed |
CSWAB Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger E12629 Weigand's Bay South - Merrimac, WI 53561 Phone (608) 643-3124 - Fax (608) 643-0005 Email: info@cswab.com - Website: www.cswab.com March 19, 2003 PRESS RELEASE For Immediate Release For more information contact: Laura Olah, CSWAB (608) 643-3124 Melissa Scanlan, Midwest Environmental Advocates (608) 251-5047 Charles J. Gantzer, Ph.D., Gantzer Environmental Software and Services, Inc. (612) 824-6662 Emissions from Badger Burning 5 Times Higher Than Disclosed Air emissions from proposed open burning at Badger Army Ammunition Plant may be at least 5 times higher than previously disclosed, prompting nearby residents to demand that the DNR not approve burning as many as 100 explosives-contaminated buildings at the closing military base. "Both Plexus Scientific, the contractor working for the U.S. Army at Badger, and the DNR's modeling contained flaws that underestimated the amount of particulate matter that will be emitted from open burning at Badger," said Charles Gantzer, PhD. "In one case, the resulting maximum property-line concentrations were at least 5 times higher than those reported to the public." "It is extremely upsetting to learn that the families living next to Badger are at much greater risk than either the DNR or the Army's contractors told us," said Laura Olah, Executive Director of Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger. "What else have they missed?" Gantzer found that the air quality modeling results presented to the public by the Army's consultant did not consider the impact of background concentrations and that the DNR's modeling included a calculation error that underestimated emissions by a factor of five. "It is possible that a simple math error (probably buried in a spreadsheet) resulted in the wrong emission rates being used in the DNR modeling runs. In particular, the revised modeling indicates potential exceedances of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for particulate matter at the Badger property lines," Gantzer said. "These findings raise serious concerns about how open burning might affect our children," Olah said. "Throughout this process the DNR has ignored risks to infants and children and has only assessed cancer risks to adults. Children breathe more air per pound of body weight than an adult and as a result, they have a greater risk of significant health effects from air pollution." "The proposed open burning at Badger will cause an exceedance of air quality standards for particulate matter; this violates Wisconsin's law that only allows open burning when it is conducted in a safe and pollution free manner," according to Melissa Scanlan, Executive Director of Midwest Environmental Advocates, a nonprofit environmental law center working to protect the environment. "Pollution in and around Badger has already placed this community at risk," Olah said. "The Army must be required to clean up its mess without compromising the quality of our air and our environment." Organizations that have formally opposed open burning include Citizens Natural Resources Association of Wisconsin, Clean Water Action Council of Wisconsin, Coalition for Peaceful Skies, Concerned Citizens of Newport, Families and Friends for Social Responsibility, Glenview Prairie Preservation Project, Interfaith Justice and Peace, Midwest Environmental Advocates, Midwest Treaty Network, Peace Action Wisconsin, Madison Chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Rock Valley Fellowship of Reconciliation, Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Wisconsin Network for Peace and Justice, Wisconsin Public Interest Research Group (WISPIRG), and the Wolf River Watershed Education Project. -END- -- Laura Olah, Executive Director Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger E12629 Weigands Bay S Merrimac, WI 53561 phone: (608)643-3124 fax: (608)643-0005 email: info@cswab.com website: http://www.cswab.com <http://www.cswab.com/> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Connecting the perchlorate dots Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Group tries to lower the boom | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Connecting the perchlorate dots Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Group tries to lower the boom |