From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 28 Mar 2003 14:11:17 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-MEF] Birds and Warriors |
The following was posted by Gil Sailer <Gilsailer@aol.com> _____________________________________________ i am always amazed at how a responsible news media can continue to publish what is clear to be less then the full truth.... those numbers of what the pentagon has spent needs to be examined to determine for what did the money go... a prime example is the high cleanup numbers at the closure bases...and the normal compliance $$ like water and sewage treatment that any responsible business must spend....and then destruction of and disposal of nuke or chemical weapons...or maintenance of them .... i would challenge anyone to look at the historical preservation act that was suppose to have been completed prior to 1970 are in some cases still incomplete ..despite repeated funding that was diverted....so ...lets get real... further ...the services have yet to demonstrate where "encroachment" from environmental legislation has caused the reduction in troop capacity.... if training or research or any military activity can be justified to be waived...there exists viable methods... and the beauty of NEPA is that it says you must consciously disclose and evaluate the "known or probable" consequences of your actions and the viable alternatives..prior to conducting them ..... and then as you conduct them ...you should assess the accuracy of those estimations...so the next time you are either validated or you add or adjust your thinking... guess the use of TCE is a prime example...what was thought at the time ..what we know now .... with a blanket waiver ... no one considers the consequences..the comparative value of the alternatives... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Birds and Warriors Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Safety, air and water | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Birds and Warriors Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Safety, air and water |