From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 2 Apr 2003 23:42:23 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] EPA circulates draft IC guidance for comments |
Please excuse the cross-posting. Several offices at U.S. U.S. EPA are circulating a draft guidance on institutional controls. "Institutional Controls: A Guide to Implementing, Monitoring, and Enforcing Institutional Controls at Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facility, UST and RCRA Corrective Action Cleanups, February 2003," is available as a 644K PDF file from http://www.epa.gov/superfund/action/ic/guide.htm. Comments are due by April 19, 2003. According to EPA, "This guidance is intended to: (1) provide Superfund, Brownfields, Federal Facility, Underground Storage Tank (UST) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action site managers and site attorneys with an overview of responsibilities for the implementation, monitoring, and enforcement of institutional controls (ICs) at their sites; and (2) discuss some of the common issues site managers and site attorneys may encounter when carrying out these responsibilities." There are no surprises in the draft guidance. It highlights the importance of early planning, calls for the inclusion of institutional controls in decision documents, and it encourages laying of the four basic types of institutional controls. These include proprietary controls, such as covenants, in which the control is legally a property interest; government controls such as zoning or well permits; information devices such as deed notices; and enforcement tools such as consent degrees, orders, or permits. The guidance attempts to standardize the development and implementation of institutional controls in support of cleanup objectives, but its repeated advice to consult legal experts serves as a constant reminder. Not only does each cleanup program bring a unique set of rules to the remediation process, but institutional controls - particularly proprietary and government controls - are subject to state laws, and thus vary enormously. Thus, the guidance is most valuable in helping officials know which questions to ask, rather than supplying the answers. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Another Coalition Enemy Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Bush administration wants military exemptions to environmental laws | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Another Coalition Enemy Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Bush administration wants military exemptions to environmental laws |