From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 7 Apr 2003 14:23:14 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Bill could impact cleanup of JPG’s depleted uran |
Indiana Friday, April 04, 2003 Bill could impact cleanup of JPG’s depleted uranium. By: Peggy Vlerebome Courier Staff Writer A congressman from Washington state has introduced legislation calling for health and environmental studies and for cleanup at sites where the military produced, tested or used depleted uranium. The Army tested munitions containing depleted uranium at Jefferson Proving Ground from 1983 to 1994. The bill “sounds like a good thing to do,” said Richard Hill, co-chairman of the JPG Restoration Advisory Board and president of the Save the Valley environmental group. The Army has estimated that it left about 77 tons of munitions containing DU on the ground at JPG and does not intend to pick it up because the DU is in the same area as tons of tested ordnance that didn’t explode but could if disturbed. The Army estimated last year that removing the depleted uranium and restoring the land would take 19 years and cost $45 million to $1.6 billion because of the presence of unexploded ordnance and the need to restore the ground. Testing at JPG disturbed the ground for a foot to a foot and a half deep, the Army said. The Army’s position has been that while the health and environmental effects of DU need more study, there is no hazard to people from the DU at the former proving ground if they are kept out of the area where it is concentrated and if warning signs, fences and gates now in place are maintained. This article can be viewed at: http://www.madisoncourier.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&SubSectionID=263&ArticleID=11472 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Proximity of old dump to school investigated Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Consumer and environmental groups at odds with military over laws | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Proximity of old dump to school investigated Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Consumer and environmental groups at odds with military over laws |