From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Apr 2003 19:15:08 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Leaving a Mess in Mesopotamia |
THE VILLAGE VOICE Leaving a Mess in Mesopotamia by Solana Pyne April 16 - 22, 2003 Raw sewage courses through canals and riverbeds. Toxic clouds from burning oil and smoldering buildings billow into the air, raining particles on the countryside. Heavy metals and a stew of chemicals from bombed industrial plants spill into the soil and pollute drinking-water supplies. Iraq doesn't look as bad as a smoky Kuwait did in the aftermath of the 1991 Gulf War, but Iraq's air, land, and water have been battered in 2003, and some experts say more Iraqi civilians will die from post-war environmental problems than have been killed during the fighting. Even before the end of the current war, the U.S. had started preparations to rebuild roads and airports, make water drinkable, and otherwise mitigate immediate public health hazards. But it hasn't addressed the toxic soup left in the wake of the bombings. The Department of Defense has done no environmental assessment in Iraq of damage, cleanup requirements, or costs, acknowledged Glen Flood, a Pentagon spokesman. Peter Zahler, a conservation biologist who supervised environmental assessment of Afghanistan as part of the Post-Conflict Assessment Unit of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), characterized the U.S. and its allies as "very unprepared" to deal with environmental damage. Still lurking are such problems as unexploded ordnance—of the 20,000 bombs and missiles dropped in the first three weeks of this war, those that exploded drilled noxious fragments into the earth, but those that didn't have turned benign backyards into potential death traps. "Post-war environmental deaths may exceed direct civilian casualties," said Saul Bloom, executive director of Arc Ecology, a San Francisco-based nonprofit that has helped foreign governments analyze the environmental impacts of U.S. military bases. This article can be viewed at: http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0316/pyne.php ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] 30 Year Feasibility Timeframe Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Study: Marine Training Won't Hurt Panhandle Environment | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] 30 Year Feasibility Timeframe Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Study: Marine Training Won't Hurt Panhandle Environment |