From: | dickboyd@aol.com |
Date: | 20 May 2003 13:28:17 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Nitrosamines was "WAR" |
Larry, thanks for pointing out the use of nitrosodimethylamine in some of the fuels used at Beale. Are you in Yuba County? The family of nitrosamine chemicals was highlighted on California's Prop 65, I believe. The stuff also shows up in cigarette smoke, bacon, hot dogs and the like as a byproduct of nitrites and nitrates reactions. As far as I know, the stuff is still used in cosmetics, fertilizer and the like. But I'm sure someone active in the field has current information. There was the comment that perchlorate may not be the worst of the things to be found in water contaminated by rocket oxidizers. But because perchlorate is so soluble and is now easier to detect (new test methods) it might be useful as a tracer to detect where the potentially contaminated water flows. Each of the California Counties has ordinances that require certain action when a well is drilled, and before the water is declared potable. Some counties even have periodic review of wells and require shut down permits to ensure they are capped off to prevent contamination from surface water. Mostly, the well driller has to seal off a certain section of pipe, estimate the flow and the like. The information seems to disappear. Unless you are the property owner or the well driller, you may not be able to find out much about the wells in the county. But then chemical contamination is a concern for more than just former Defense sites. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Potshots at the environment Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Guam | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Potshots at the environment Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Guam |