From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 2 Jul 2003 15:24:51 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Greens Just Keep Singing the Blues |
The following article was posted by Geoffrey Cullison <caseyjones12@hotmail.com> ________________________________________________________________ THE WASHINGTON POST Greens Just Keep Singing the Blues By Christine Todd Whitman Saturday, June 28, 2003; Page A25 If anyone doubts that the tone of the debate over environmental policy in this city is in serious need of improvement, he or she need only look at the reaction to the release this week of the Environmental Protection Agency's first-ever "Draft Report on the Environment." This report, the product of more than two years' work collaborating with more than two dozen federal departments and agencies and state and private-sector contributors, is designed to help answer a question I posed at my confirmation hearing 21/2 years ago: Are America's environmental policies making our air cleaner, its water purer and its land better protected -- or not? But judging by the reaction of some professional environmentalists to our report, you'd think we had tried to pass off "The Skeptical Environmentalist" as "Silent Spring." To some, it doesn't seem to matter that our report uses sound, sophisticated scientific data to measure how far we've come and to suggest where we still have room to improve. The report looks at the actual health of our environment and helps us measure where our 30 years of effort have made a positive difference and where they have not met our expectations. Some have condemned the report because it doesn't discuss global climate change. It doesn't, but the report does include dozens of science-based environmental indicators for air, water and land. The report shows us where we are, so we have a better idea of what we must do to get where we want to be. For too long the environmental debate has centered on counting the number of new laws we've passed and new regulations we've written, on tallying up how much in fines, fees and penalties we've levied on polluters. Focusing on those aspects -- measuring process instead of progress -- may be easier, but it has made it difficult to adapt environmental policymaking to changing times and challenges. When the environmental debate turns on questions of process, attempts at innovation have a hard time getting out of the starting gate. An attempt to modernize a law is cast as an effort to undermine it. A good-faith effort to try new methods of achieving better results is characterized as a retreat from existing commitments. This piece can be viewed at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A43458-2003Jun27.html?nav=hptoc_eo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] high-resolution photos of UXO Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Credibility Gap and RABs | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] high-resolution photos of UXO Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Credibility Gap and RABs |