From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 11 Jul 2003 18:43:01 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Air National Guard may fly away |
California MOUNTAIN VIEW VOICE Air National Guard may fly away By Candice Shih July 11, 2003 Like a scene from "Groundhog Day," the city has reawakened to the possibility that the California Air National Guard's 129th Rescue Wing may move from Moffett Field to Atwater, Calif. On Tuesday, after the city council learned that Rep. Anna Eshoo and the rest of the Bay Area's Congressional delegation had sent another letter -- the second in just over a year -- to Air Force Secretary James Roche pleading for it to stay, the council decided to send its own letter to state officials stating a similar case. Last spring, Eshoo and the city became aware that the Air Guard was considering moving to Castle Airforce Base because its rent to landlord NASA and the cost of living in the Bay Area were too high. She advocated keeping the Air Guard at Moffett Field because of its security benefits, and reminded Roche of the $16 million of federal money recently used to build its new hangar. Eshoo was given hope that the issues she raised would be taken seriously, but the Air Guard indicated that it's still contemplating the move, despite a $45 million price tag on a new hangar at Castle, which, like Moffett Field, has toxics around the base. "Were they to leave, they would leave a gaping hole in the Bay Area," she said. "This is not about keeping operations in one's Congressional district. It's beyond that." This article can be viewed at: http://www.mv-voice.com/morgue/2003/2003_07_11.airgrd.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Navy to retest Moffett Homes Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] new Army perchlorate guidance | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Navy to retest Moffett Homes Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] new Army perchlorate guidance |