From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 16 Jul 2003 17:14:27 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Military releases missile defense impact report for Valdez, Kodiak |
Alaska JUNEAU EMPIRE ONLINE Military releases missile defense impact report for Valdez, Kodiak Pentagon considers storing radar equipment in Valdez between missile defense tests THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FAIRBANKS - The scenic impact of a 25-story radar dome and platform stored in Valdez would be minimal because of the existing trans-Alaska oil pipeline terminal, the military has concluded. Valdez is under consideration for storing the radar equipment between missile defense tests. That assessment of the proposed "sea-based X-band radar" is contained in a final environmental impact statement on a portion of the missile defense testing system. The Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency released the document last week. The document reviews potential environmental effects of a wide range of facilities the agency might build or upgrade as part of a new missile defense "test bed" recommended by Pentagon planners. In addition to upgrades in California and the South Pacific, the agency proposes to add launch pads at Alaska's state-owned Kodiak Launch Complex and build an X-band radar on top of an oil drilling platform that could be moved around the ocean during tests. The radar and platform could be housed at one of several West Coast ports, including Valdez and Adak. The report does not recommend a particular home port, according to Maj. Cathy Reardon, spokeswoman for Missile Defense Agency in Arlington, Va. The choice will be made by Gen. Ronald Kadish, head of the MDA, some time after Aug. 11 when a 30-day comment period on the final document ends, she said. This article can be viewed at: http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/071603/sta_defense.shtml ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Fairness questioned in ghost fleet scrap deal Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Congressional, state delegations differ on value of war game zone | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Fairness questioned in ghost fleet scrap deal Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Congressional, state delegations differ on value of war game zone |