From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 Jul 2003 17:21:38 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Drinking water standards |
We've trying to understand recent reports, some of which we sent out via our listserver, that EPA has delayed plans to develop drinking-water standards for perchlorate, MTBE, and other contaminants. EPA recently announced its "Regulatory Determinations for Priority Contaminants on the Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List." Both the Federal Register notice and a fact sheet are available at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/cclregdetermine.html. In my view, the announcement simply confirms past EPA decisions to delay the promulgation of standards. I was greatly disappointed by one of those decisions, the extension of the perchlorate review process, because the Defense Department is unwilling to address adequately perchlorate contamination until a standard is in place. But this notice does not seem to introduce any new delays. Furthermore, the Federal Register notice states, "where EPA determines there is sufficient information on this or any other unregulated contaminant, the Agency is prepared to act in advance of the next five year regulatory determination cycle." To me that suggests that continuing external pressure should prompt EPA to act expeditiously once the National Academy of Sciences review is completed. I have pasted below the paragraphs in the announcement that discuss perchlorate and MTBE. Lenny *** "With respect to perchlorate, EPA is gathering national occurrence data on perchlorate in drinking water through the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring (UCM) Rule. The Agency is also completing a rigorous peer review of health effects studies and is developing a final toxicity review and risk characterization. As part of this effort, EPA has asked the National Academy of Sciences to review science issues related to the 2002 draft EPA risk assessment for perchlorate. In addition, the Agency is funding research studies on treatability of perchlorate for PWSs. Some of the technology currently in use at hazardous waste sites is being evaluated for the feasibility of using it in water treatment at community water systems. At the same time, EPA is seeking to improve the analytical method sensitivity that would allow concentrations of perchlorate to be quantified at lower levels than are presently possible. The Agency is moving concurrently in each of these areas to meet data and research needs as quickly as possible. When the necessary information is collected, we plan to move forward with a regulatory determination. In this regard, it should be emphasized that where EPA determines there is sufficient information on this or any other unregulated contaminant, the Agency is prepared to act in advance of the next five year regulatory determination cycle." "Regarding MTBE, on-going activities will provide the Agency with improved health effects and occurrence data. At this time, EPA is preparing its revised risk assessment for MTBE for peer review. The Agency established the 1997 Drinking Water Advisory for MTBE at 20-40 micrograms per liter (µg/L, or parts per billion, ppb) to avoid unacceptable taste and odor and provide a protective margin of exposure for adverse health effects. The 20-40 ppb level was not based on the possible cancer risks. As a result of the UCM Rule, data from PWSs required to monitor for MTBE will be available in the middle of 2004." -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Why Defense Must Change Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] If Renzi and Kolbe score, the river loses the game | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Why Defense Must Change Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] If Renzi and Kolbe score, the river loses the game |