From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 31 Jul 2003 17:21:54 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Navy makes its case for OLF in the East |
North Carolina WASHINGTON DAILY NEWS Navy makes its case for OLF in the East By Rachel Brown Hackney July 31, 2003 HAVELOCK -- The commander of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet on Wednesday sought to reassure local government officials and news media representatives from Eastern North Carolina that Washington County residents will be compensated adequately for the loss of property to make way for an outlying landing field to support the training of F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet pilots. Adm. Robert J. Natter also emphasized the importance of the OLF to prepare pilots for new military campaign strategies developed in response to the United States' ongoing fight against terrorism. The final environmental impact statement on the basing of the Super Hornets on the East Coast, released July 18, says the preferred alternative is for two squadrons to go to Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station in Havelock and eight to go to Oceana Naval Air Station in Virginia Beach, Va. A replacement squadron of 24 aircraft also will go to Oceana. The FEIS also calls for an OLF to be built in Washington County, partly because that site is nearly equidistant between the two air stations. During a press conference in a hangar just off the flight line at Cherry Point, Natter said of the Washington County OLF site, "I've worked on this (issue) personally for over three years ... and I think this is the best location." That process included researching more than 70 sites. "We didn't pay attention to state borders. We didn't pay attention to county borders," he said. During an earlier, "editorial board" session with approximately 10 print and TV journalists, Dan Cecchini, project manager for the environmental impact statement on the Super Hornets, said information about wetlands, population centers and wildlife was considered in the effort to determine the best OLF site. "It was really a whittling-down process," he added. Natter was asked whether the Navy ultimately had decided wetlands concerns were more problematic than wildlife concerns, as the Washington County site is only five miles from the Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, home to thousands of migratory birds in the winter. Environmental groups have raised concerns that pilots could be killed or injured through airstrikes involving some of the birds in the area of the refuge. Natter responded, "We do not intend to do low-levels (of flight) over that (refuge)." He added that a study of the wildfowl population there did not indicate a greater presence of migratory birds than at other sites already used by the Navy. This article can be viewed at: http://www.wdnweb.com/articles/2003/07/31/news/news01.txt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Aberdeen radiological waste site set to be cleaned up Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Experts: Reactivating wells an expensive process | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Aberdeen radiological waste site set to be cleaned up Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Experts: Reactivating wells an expensive process |