From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 8 Aug 2003 15:37:42 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] This is congressional? |
California IMPERIAL VALLEY PRESS Our Opinion: This is congressional? Monday, August 4, 2003 3:51 PM PDT If Richard Pombo, the big mustachioed, big cowboy hat wearing (and we don't know him but we would bet cowboy boot swaggering) congressman from Tracy in Northern California wants to have a meeting regarding the Imperial Sand Dunes for off-roaders and their supporters, he has every right to do that. If everyone invited and allowed to speak is a supporter of the dunes being as open as possible, if everyone is on the same side, and there is a lot of preaching to the choir, he can call it a get-together, he can call it a rally, heck, he even call it a dunes revival meeting. What he shouldn't call it is a congressional hearing. That gives it the aura of respectability, of fairness to the planned Aug. 18 sand dunes "congressional hearing" at (ironically) SeaWorld Adventure Park in San Diego. And from what he have heard, fairness is not exactly being sought at this shindig. Pombo has invited speakers from the off-road community, county supervisors from Kern, Riverside, San Bernardino and Imperial counties and representatives from the mining, ranching and film industries. Who Pombo, chairman of the House Resources Committee, is not inviting are environmentalists. Also not invited is the congressman in whose area the dunes lie, our own Bob Filner. This article can be viewed at: http://www.ivpressonline.com/articles/2003/08/04/opinion/ed02.txt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Unintended medical consequences? Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Military bows to water rules | |
Prev by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Unintended medical consequences? Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Military bows to water rules |