From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 8 Aug 2003 16:56:39 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Army Corps Plays Games On Hamilton Toxic Cleanup |
California COASTAL POST Army Corps Plays Games On Hamilton Toxic Cleanup By Elena Belsky August, 2003 The Hamilton Wetlands Restoration Project (HWRP) is an ambitious, innovative concept that, if done properly, could create a model for wetlands restoration. Unfortunately, there has been very little done properly to ensure that the project is completely viable. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC), the US Army and US Army Corps of Engineers' (ACoE) continue to offer vague, incomplete and incorrect information on the wetlands project, with the Army also providing mishandled and dubious sampling data. Many major issues of concern remain unanswered. Why has the ACoE failed to provide the project's modeling results to the public? Where are DTSC and RWQCB provisions mandating that all of the toxics be either removed or rendered harmless before opening the wetlands to the tidal action of San Pablo and San Francisco bays? Who would be responsible for toxic releases into the bay, and what are the contingency plans? Will there be consequences for the Army for its continued poor data handling and, at times, flagrant manipulation of data? Recently, the RWQCB, DTSC and Army concurrently released six highly technical documents related to the HWRP-nearly all of which had concurrent deadlines for public review. Citizens complained about this mass "dumping" as a technique to overwhelm the public, and about difficulty accessing the documents. Requests for extensions to the public review periods were denied by the Army (the state agencies offered no response). Such behavior is not conducive to public participation. But maybe that was the point as the documents were rife with serious technical flaws. Sue Lattanzio, director of Friends of Novato Creek, an environmental watchdog group, states in their assessment of the state agency and Army documents: "Overall, it is unclear whether the proposed actions will be protective of public health and the environment or, for that matter, exactly what is proposed." This article can be viewed at: http://www.coastalpost.com/03/08/05.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] A burning debate Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Building destroyed in S.J. explosion | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] A burning debate Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Building destroyed in S.J. explosion |