From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Sep 2003 14:11:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Biologist slams Fort Richardson fence plan |
Alaska ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS Biologist slams Fort Richardson fence plan FISH AND GAME: Wildlife expert says proposed barrier would take severe toll on moose, other animals. By Doug O'Harra September 14, 2003 A controversial proposal to fence much of Fort Richardson's boundary through Anchorage has drawn sharp criticism from the state's local management biologist, who argues the current design will indirectly kill off lots of moose. Building up to 34 miles of 8-foot chain-link or galvanized rail barriers from Chugiak to Muldoon and Far North Bicentennial Park will also create serious problems for other wildlife and even contradicts Fort Richardson's natural resource policy, according to official written and verbal comments by Rick Sinnott, representing the Alaska Department of Fish and Game. "The proposed fence will have a greater impact on moose populations than any other project in the 90-year history of Anchorage," he wrote. In a 13-page memo to the Army, Sinnott argued that the military's fence analysis contains mistakes and bad data, doesn't consider the impact combined with other military projects and may violate federal rules. The whole project needs to be redone under a broader and more detailed environmental study. "If I had my way, I would see them abandon the fence idea," he said this week. This article can be viewed at: http://www.adn.com/front/story/3920224p-3942454c.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Cleanup of chemicals at Army site hits snags Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Lockheed may face tighter pollution limit | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Cleanup of chemicals at Army site hits snags Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Lockheed may face tighter pollution limit |