From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Sep 2003 14:21:00 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] State, military interests converge on flight path |
Florida TALLAHASSEE DEMOCRAT State, military interests converge on flight path Plan to conserve Panhandle land pleases many By Bruce Ritchie September 14, 2003 The military pilots zooming in at more than 400 mph from the Gulf of Mexico are moving too fast to see the black bears, Chapman's rhododendron and tropical waxweed west of Apalachicola. Flying as low as 300 feet over what scientists say is one of the nation's most important ecological regions, the pilots turn west near Blountstown. Other planes, flying at higher altitudes, continue through the area toward Eglin Air Force Base, where they fire missiles or drop laser-guided bombs and other "smart" weapons on a test range. Along with the rest of the Florida Panhandle, the area west of the Apalachicola River also lies within the path of development. Newcomers to other areas of the nation with bases have raised complaints about noise, leading to restrictions on training and operations. Before growth comes to the Panhandle, state and military officials and The Nature Conservancy environmental group want to protect military training while preserving the region's wildlife. They are working to conserve a flight path that is 100 miles long and 10 miles wide, covering about 750,000 acres. "If we can all reach agreement on this concept, the plan is for us all to go out and seek the resources to make this happen," said Jesse Borthwick, a senior environmental scientist at Eglin Air Force Base. This article can be viewed at: http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/news/local/6766285.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Lockheed may face tighter pollution limit Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Lockheed may face tighter pollution limit | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] Lockheed may face tighter pollution limit Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Air Force seeks comment on Elmendorf project |