From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 20 Oct 2003 20:07:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] LA Times series on base closure |
The Los Angeles Times has been running a major series about the 2005 round of base closures and its anticipated impact on California. Since Times articles are available free of charge for one week, some of the links below my expire soon. LS *** Least 100 Bases Said to Be in Line for Closure: John Hendren. Los Angeles Times October 14, 2003 Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is planning to close at least 100 of the nation's 425 military bases -- more than in the four previous rounds of base closures combined -- beginning in 2005, Pentagon insiders said Monday. Rumsfeld is expected to submit to the congressional Base Closure and Realignment Commission a plan to shutter as many as one-third of Army bases, one-quarter of Air Force bases and a smaller fraction of Marine Corps and Navy bases, a senior defense official said on condition of anonymity. Such a proposal would guarantee a political firestorm on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers jealously protect the bases in their home states or districts. ... See http://www.latimes.com/la-na-bases14oct14,1,4789345.story *** Fight Looms Over Base Closing Plan State officials from the congressional to local levels intend to oppose shutdowns by Pentagon. By Richard Simon and Tony Perry Times Staff Writers October 15, 2003 WASHINGTON — California's officials are gearing up to fight a fresh round of base closings that could eliminate scores of military installations across the country in 2005. Although no list of the next bases to be closed has been put together, members of the California delegation are working to limit the impact of new base closures on the state. "From California's perspective, God almighty, we gave at the bank more than any other state," said Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Riverside). Officials fear that several California bases scrutinized in the last round of base closings will be vulnerable. Among them: China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station, in the Mojave Desert, and Beale Air Force Base, north of Sacramento. In San Diego, the Marine Corps Recruit Depot, the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command Headquarters, and the submarine fleet's squadron 11 at the Point Loma Naval Base were identified at risk by a consultant to the city. But California is not the only state preparing to fight back. Others, too, are planning lobbying campaigns to save bases seen as important sources of income and employment. ... See http://www.latimes.com/la-me-bases15oct15,1,262765.story *** EDITORIAL Big Risk in Cutting Troops October 16, 2003 Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has experience at creating lean organizations. When he became president of the pharmaceutical conglomerate G.D. Searle & Co. in 1977, his first move was to sell off 20 of the company's businesses. He has wanted to apply the same concept to the federal government for years, writing in a 1995 essay for the business-oriented Heartland Institute, "Whatever Congress does to downsize the federal government, the odds are that it should have done more, rather than less, and that it should have done it sooner, rather than later." He noted admiringly that Scott Paper Co. had "cut 71% of its headquarters staff, 50% of management and 20% of hourly employees." Rumsfeld's expected proposal, reported by Times staffer John Hendren on Tuesday, to close at least 100 of the remaining 425 military bases beginning in 2005 is in that mold. Rumsfeld has made a leaner, more technological military a focus of his Cabinet service. But although some additional base closings are justified, a military already unable to field sufficient forces in Iraq and Afghanistan may not be helped by shuttering nearly 25% of its bases. The criteria for base closings have not been revealed, but, to the anger of uniformed officers, they are believed almost certain to include troop cuts. ... See http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-defense16oct16,1,7765741.story Closure of Marine Boot Camp in San Diego Seen as Unlikely The chairman of a key House panel says the depot is cost-effective. But L.A. Air Force Base in El Segundo is seen as vulnerable. By Tony Perry and Richard Simon Times Staff Writers October 16, 2003 SAN DIEGO — The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee said Wednesday that it is highly unlikely that the Marine Corps Recruit Depot here will be recommended for closure and that he would oppose such a move if recommended. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon) said the depot, which trains 21,000 recruits a year, has proved its cost-effectiveness and its sizable contribution to military readiness. Of several California military installations thought by consultants and others to be at risk of closure in an upcoming round of military cutbacks, the recruit depot is probably the best known. Opened in 1923, it is one of two Marine boot camps nationwide. Hunter said that the depot's proximity to Camp Pendleton, Marine Corps Air Station Miramar and San Diego Navy bases made it "an invaluable asset." With its 12 major bases and other facilities, San Diego County has the greatest concentration of U.S. military troops of any region in the country. "San Diego is the complete military complex," Hunter said. "Historically, those assets that are most vulnerable are those that are limited or 'niche.' That's not San Diego." ... See http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-depot16oct16,1,5022110.story *** Ventura County on Alert Over New Round of Base Closures Members of Congress and local leaders hope recent changes at Point Mugu will help keep it off the Pentagon's list. By Amanda Covarrubias Times Staff Writer October 18, 2003 In the years since federal officials decided to spare the Point Mugu naval base in 1995, a coalition of economic and political leaders has worked behind the scenes to ensure that Ventura County's military installation stays open. Those leaders will face another test in 2005, when base-closure commissioners are scheduled to shutter more stations across the country and the competition by states to keep theirs open grows tighter. In the last decade, Ventura County officials introduced a number of changes designed to make Naval Base Ventura County more valuable to West Coast military efforts. They include combining the operations of the Point Mugu Naval Air Station, a testing site for missiles fired by naval aircraft, and the Port Hueneme Naval Construction Battalion Center, one of two Seabee bases in the United States. But whether the new and improved Naval Base Ventura County can survive next time around remains to be seen as states and counties across the nation prepare to fight for their bases, which are seen as important sources of income and employment. Point Mugu had been on a list for closure in 1995 but was spared after heavy lobbying by local officials, including U.S. Rep. Elton Gallegly (R-Simi Valley), who said he was willing to again fight local base closures. ... See http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-vcbase18oct18,1,1587741.story -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF]--CPEO PHONE NUMBER CHANGE-- Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Depleted Uranium in Rolling Stone | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF]--CPEO PHONE NUMBER CHANGE-- Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Depleted Uranium in Rolling Stone |