From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 7 Nov 2003 19:38:32 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Marine Mammal protection weakened |
Section 319 of the Fiscal Year 2004 Defense Authorization Act enacts the Defense Department's proposal to weaken the Marine Mammal Protection Act and make it much more difficult for environmental organizations to litigate restrictions on Navy sonar and other military readiness activities that may impact marine mammals. Before the Navy displays a "Mission Accomplished" banner, however, it should consider that the majority of the public (in the U.S. and most allied nations) strongly objects to actions that kill (or even disturb) whales, dolphins, and other marine mammals. Even if permitted under law, it is likely that the deployment of loud active sonar systems in sensitive areas will NOT be tolerated. The fully formatted language appears on pages 65-68 of the PDF file downloadable from http://www.house.gov/rules/H1588_CR.PDF. I have pasted a text version below. Lenny Siegel *** SEC. 319. MILITARY READINESS AND MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION. (a) DEFINITION OF HARASSMENT FOR MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITIES. - Section 3(18) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1362(18)) is amended by striking subparagraphs (B) and (C) and inserting the following new subparagraphs: "(B) In the case of a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note) or a scientific research activity conducted by or on behalf of the Federal Government consistent with section 104(c)(3), the term 'harassment' means - "(i) any act that injures or has the significant potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild; or "(ii) any act that disturbs or is likely to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of natural behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, surfacing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering, to a point where such behavioral patterns are abandoned or significantly altered. "(C) The term 'Level A harassment' means harassment described in subparagraph (A)(i) or, in the case of a military readiness activity or scientific research activity described in subparagraph (B), harassment described in subparagraph (B)(i). ' '(D) The term 'Level B harassment' means harassment described in subparagraph (A)(ii) or, in the case of a military readiness activity or scientific research activity described in subparagraph (B), harassment described in subparagraph (B)(ii).". (b) EXEMPTION OF ACTIONS NECESSARY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE. - Section 101 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371) is amended by inserting after subsection (e) the following: "(f) EXEMPTION OF ACTIONS NECESSARY FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE. - (1) The Secretary of Defense, after conferring with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Interior, or both, as appropriate, may exempt any action or category of actions undertaken by the Department of Defense or its components from compliance with any requirement of this Act, if the Secretary determines that it is necessary for national defense. "(2) An exemption granted under this subsection - "(A) subject to subparagraph (B), shall be effective for a period specified by the Secretary of Defense; and "(B) shall not be effective for more than 2 years. "(3)(A) The Secretary of Defense may issue additional exemptions under this subsection for the same action or category of actions, after - "(i) conferring with the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Interior, or both as appropriate; and "(ii) making a new determination that the additional exemption is necessary for national defense. "(B) Each additional exemption under this paragraph shall be effective for a period specified by the Secretary of Defense, of not more than 2 years. "(4) Not later than 30 days after issuing an exemption under paragraph (1) or an additional exemption under paragraph (3), the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate notice describing the exemption and the reasons therefor. The notice may be provided in classified form if the Secretary of Defense determines that use of the classified form is necessary for reasons of national security.". (c) INCIDENTAL TAKINGS OF MARINE MAMMALS IN MILITARY READINESS ACTIVITIES. - Section 101(a)(5) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)) is amended - (1) in subparagraph (A) - (A) by redesignating clauses (i) and (ii) and subclauses (I) and (II) as subclauses (I) and (II) and items (aa) and (bb), respectively; (B) by inserting "(i)" after "(5)(A)"; and (C) by adding at the end the following new clauses: "(ii) For a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), a determination of 'least practicable adverse impact on such species or stock' under clause (i)(II)(aa) shall include consideration of personnel safety, practicality of implementation, and impact on the effectiveness of the military readiness activity. Before making the required determination, the Secretary shall consult with the Department of Defense regarding personnel safety, practicality of implementation, and impact on the effectiveness of the military readiness activity. "(iii) Notwithstanding clause (i), for any authorization affecting a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), the Secretary shall publish the notice required by such clause only in the Federal Register."; (2) in subparagraph (D), by adding at the end the following new clauses: "(vi) For a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), a determination of 'least practicable adverse impact on such species or stock' under clause (i)(I) shall include consideration of personnel safety, practicality of implementation, and impact on the effectiveness of the military readiness activity. Before making the required determination, the Secretary shall consult with the Department of Defense regarding personnel safety, practicality of implementation, and impact on the effectiveness of the military readiness activity. "(vii) Notwithstanding clause (iii), for any authorization affecting a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note), the Secretary shall publish the notice required by such clause only in the Federal Register."; and (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: "(F) Notwithstanding the provisions of this subsection, any authorization affecting a military readiness activity (as defined in section 315(f) of Public Law 107–314; 16 U.S.C. 703 note) shall not be subject to the following requirements: "(i) In subparagraph (A), 'within a specified geographical region' and 'within that region of small numbers'. "(ii) In subparagraph (B), 'within a specified geographical region' and 'within one or more regions'. "(iii) In subparagraph (D), 'within a specific geographic region', 'of small numbers', and 'within that region'.". -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Endangered Species Act language Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Congress requires encroachment study | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Endangered Species Act language Next by Thread: RE: [CPEO-MEF] Marine Mammal protection weakened |