From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 23 Dec 2003 18:22:29 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] DoD Draft Selection Criteria for Base Closure and Realignment |
The following is an excerpt from the "Department of Defense Draft Selection Criteria for Closing and Realigning Military Installations Inside the United States" Notice from the Tuesday, Dec 23, 2003 edition of the Federal Register. The entire notice can be viewed online as a pdf at: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2003/pdf/03-31631.pdf _________________________________________ C. Draft Selection Criteria It is proposed that the Department of Defense use the following criteria in making recommendations for the closure or realignment of military installations inside the United States: -In recommending military installations for closure or realignment, the Department of Defense will, giving priority consideration to military value (criteria 1-4), consider: Military Value 1. The current and future mission capabilities and the impact on operational readiness of the Department of Defense's total force, including the impact on joint warfighting, training, and readiness. 2. The availability and condition of land, facilities and associated airspace (including training areas suitable for maneuver by ground, naval, or air forces throughout a diversity of climate and terrain areas and staging areas for the use of the Armed Forces in homeland defense missions) at both existing and potential receiving locations. 3. The ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization, and future total force requirements at both existing and potential receiving locations to support operations and training. 4. The cost of operations and the manpower implications. Other Considerations 5. The extent and timing of potential costs and savings, including the number of years, beginning with the date of completion of the closure or realignment, for the savings to exceed the costs. 6. The economic impact on existing communities in the vicinity of military installations. 7. The ability of both the existing and potential receiving communities' infrastructure to support forces, missions, and personnel. 8. The environmental impact, including the impact of costs related to potential environmental restoration, waste management, and environmental compliance activities. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Lawsuit Seeks Protection For One Of The World’s Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Pentagon may close overseas facilities | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Lawsuit Seeks Protection For One Of The World’s Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Pentagon may close overseas facilities |