Hill AFB again going to battle -- for survival

[CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org>]

Utah
DESERET MORNING NEWS
Hill AFB again going to battle -- for survival
Pentagon orders bases to submit data for use in deciding closures
By Lee Davidson
January 7, 2003

WASHINGTON -- Formally beginning work on the next round of base closures,
the Pentagon on Tuesday ordered all bases nationwide to begin submitting
data to help it decide which ones should be shut down to save money.

Utah leaders, meanwhile, say they are unsure whether the Pentagon's new,
proposed criteria for determining which bases should survive will help
or hurt Hill Air Force Base, the state's largest employer with more than
23,000 civilian and military workers.

"Some portions, on the surface, appear to help Hill -- but there's
nothing you can hang your hat on and say it's a done deal. It's still a
tenuous process. . . . The criteria are a bit more generalized than I
had hoped," said Rep. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, a member of the House Armed
Services Committee.

The eight specific criteria proposed give most weight to "military
value." They also order consideration of such things as cost of
operations; how long before a closure would bring savings considering
shutdown costs; economic impact on the community; environmental impacts;
and the ability of other bases to absorb or transfer work.

Utah officials say the second-highest priority criteria among the eight
specifics proposed may help Hill the most. It orders giving priority to
facilities and airspace that offer training "through a diversity of
climate and terrain areas."

 "The Utah Test and Training Range (operated by Hill) offers all sorts
of terrain, which you don't get with many ranges that are only over
water," said Sen. Bob Bennett, R-Utah. "And Hill operates in all kinds
of weather."

Bishop added, "The change of seasons, the terrain and the number of
flying days at Hill are all pluses."

Also, Utah officials have long argued that Hill is among the most
cost-effective of the nation's large repair-and-maintenance depots;
would be expensive to close; may not allow true closure of its test
range because of environmental problems from unexploded ordnance; and
would devastate Utah's economy if it closes.

Hill's payroll exceeds $838 million, in 2002 figures. Base officials say
Hill's total impact on the Utah economy is more than $2.5 billion
yearly.

Vickie McCall, director of the Utah Defense Alliance, a group chartered
by the state to help defend Hill, said recently, "If Hill closes, we
would not only be in a recession, we would be in a depression, and it
could take us 20 years to recover."

This article can be viewed at:
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,580036773,00.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS.  Your generous support will ensure that our
important work on military and environmental issues will continue.
Please consider one of our donation options.  Thank you.
http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0