From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 28 Jan 2004 20:11:50 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Reassurances don't end fears about tainted water |
Colorado ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS Reassurances don't end fears about tainted water By Jim Tankersley January 22, 2004 LOUVIERS - State officials assured residents of this small Douglas County town Wednesday night that toxic remnants of a nearby explosives plant won't end up in local drinking water. But the meeting dissolved into frustration for many residents and public health activists, who were shuffled into a glorified pantry to record public comments on a plan to end cleanup at part of the plant. Several people said they left more worried than ever about the safety of their taps. The plant, which sits about a mile southwest of Louviers, produced explosives for 30 years, ending in 1996. Its current owner, Dyno-Nobel Inc., is engaged in a cleanup effort overseen by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, which the company wants to end soon. Activists worry that groundwater below the site - shown in tests to contain high levels of explosive remnants, some believed to cause cancer - could migrate to nearby drinking wells. Dyno-Nobel and health department officials say there's no chance that will happen. They stressed the position Wednesday at a public hearing on a proposal to close cleanup efforts in an area once used to burn hazardous waste. This article can be viewed at: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_2595393,00.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Changes in law environmental friendly Next by Date: Toxic water or technical glitch? | |
Prev by Thread: Changes in law environmental friendly Next by Thread: Toxic water or technical glitch? |