From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 19 Feb 2004 19:47:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Guest View: Otero Fence Avoids Cleanup |
New Mexico MOUNTAIN VIEW TELEGRAPH Guest View: Otero Fence Avoids Cleanup By Matt Turgeon Thursday, February 12, 2004 I am writing in regard to the issue of Otero Canyon, and the proposed action by Kirtland Air Force Base (KAFB) of placing nearly 61/2 miles of chain-link fence in land leased from the U.S. Forest Service. This parcel of land, approximately 7,300 acres, is bounded between South 14 to the east and KAFB to the west, and is owned by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), but leased to the Department of Defense (DoD). U.S. Geological (Survey) markers are located on some of the trails within this area, and local residents have used much of the land as a recreation area for many, many years. We in New Mexico have enjoyed this beautiful area after work, on weekends, holidays and whenever the time allows. Long ago, due to the efforts to support World War II, this area was added to a parcel of land used to create the existence of what is known today as KAFB. The Otero Canyon area, or commonly known as the "withdrawal area," was used sporadically by the DoD from the time of the lease of this land until now. Because of the infrequent use of this land by the DoD, people on horseback, bicycle, motorcycle and foot began recreating in the area for the many scenic vistas and to also visit the land their ancestors used before the withdrawal. Slowly it became a travel destination for folks around the state, and subsequently the nation, to enjoy. Tourists thus contributed to the economies of local communities such as Tijeras, Cedar Crest and, of course, Albuquerque. This article can be viewed at: http://www.mvtelegraph.com/opinion/144254mtnoped02-12-04.htm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Perchlorate standard not near, official says Next by Date: Incendiary Fragment ID | |
Prev by Thread: Perchlorate standard not near, official says Next by Thread: Incendiary Fragment ID |