From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 2 Mar 2004 19:03:35 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Military endangers public by shirking duty to clean up its messes |
Wisconsin THE CAPITAL TIMES Laura Olah: Military endangers public by shirking duty to clean up its messes By Laura Olah March 1, 2004 Rural Wisconsin families are paying the ultimate price for decades of delayed cleanup of environmental toxins left by the U.S. military. Recently two more families learned that their drinking water wells are contaminated with unsafe levels of explosives from the Badger Army Ammunition Plant. They are now drinking bottled water provided by the Army. This is not the first time farm families living near Badger have learned that solvents and other wastes from decades of munitions production poisoned their drinking water. In 1990, three families living nearly two miles from Badger learned that levels of carcinogenic solvents in their water were 15 times higher than safe standards. And worse, that they had been drinking and bathing in contaminated water for more than 15 years. A suspected source of the water contamination discovered recently is a series of settling ponds that span the southern boundary of the 7,400-acre facility. During active production years, the ponds carried industrial and sanitary waste water from inside the plant to the nearby Wisconsin River. Residual levels of mercury, lead and other pollutants in the river are so potent that tiny creatures that normally thrive in healthy river sediments are nonexistent. Beginning in the late 1970s, the U.S. military began to take a serious look at the potential environmental cost of the production, testing and disposal of munitions, including at Badger. The first study, completed in May 1977, identified many of the sites at Badger that have still not been cleaned up, including the settling ponds and the river. According to an enforceable cleanup plan issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the state Department of Natural Resources in 1993, these sites should have been dealt with years ago. For more than a decade, however, the Army has successfully argued that it doesn't have the money to complete the required level of cleanup, pushing instead for deed and use restrictions that would allow more contamination to be left in place. This article can be viewed at: http://www.madison.com/captimes/opinion/column/guest/69164.php ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Second Thoughts on a Chemical: In Water, How Much Is Too Much? Next by Date: Big Island littered with unexploded ordnance | |
Prev by Thread: Second Thoughts on a Chemical: In Water, How Much Is Too Much? Next by Thread: Big Island littered with unexploded ordnance |