From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 22 Mar 2004 20:37:07 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Friendly fire |
=========================================================== Are you looking for savings on products you use everyday? Visit Quality Health today and see the coupons, free samples and special offers our members enjoy each and everyday. http://click.topica.com/caab3ozaVxieSa8wsBba/ Ivo Interactive =========================================================== North Carolina CHARLOTTE OBSERVER Friendly fire `Military-unfriendly' is not a base-closing criteria Posted on Mon, Mar. 22, 2004 To hear some state leaders tell it, unless North Carolina enthusiastically welcomes the Navy's proposal for a jet aircraft practice landing field in Eastern North Carolina adjacent to an important wildlife refuge -- rather than at N.C. sites the state believes are better for the Navy -- the Pentagon will take a dim view and start closing military bases in this state next year. In particular they fear that the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission will penalize North Carolina when it begins deliberations in 2005 on the next round of congressionally mandated base closures. State Sen. Tony Rand, D-Cumberland, recently wrote Gov. Mike Easley, "With the BRAC process beginning, I do not want anyone to believe that North Carolina is anything but an enthusiastic supporter of our nation's military." And state Sen. Scott Thomas, D-Craven, whose district includes Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point, where some of the Navy's new jets would be based, said, "The state should not take an action that will cause harm to our good relations with the military at this critical period" and added, "It would only call into question the state's true commitment to being `the most military friendly state in the nation.' " Those would be good points if the Base Realignment and Closure Commission criteria had anything to do with military friendliness. They don't. The base-closing criteria deal only with the needs of the military. They are mute on whether a state or community welcomes the military. BRAC's criteria, issued last month, include four that deal with "Military Value:" The current and future mission capabilities and impact on the operational readiness of the Defense Department's readiness; availability and condition of land, facilities and airspace for training by ground, naval or air forces; ability to accommodate contingency, mobilization or future forces for operations or training; and the cost of operations and manpower. This article can be viewed at: http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/news/8245881.htm?1c =========================================================== Graduate in less than 13 months with AIU's Online virtual campus. Classrooms and student service as close as your computer. Highly accredited, study anytime ? anywhere. http://click.topica.com/caab2L5aVxieSa8wsBbf/ AIU =========================================================== ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Hazardous stockpile puts Army to the test Next by Date: Local salvage yard takes on Ghost Fleet | |
Prev by Thread: Hazardous stockpile puts Army to the test Next by Thread: Re: Friendly fire |