From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Jun 2004 18:18:34 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | Stakeholder's Guide to Munitions Response |
----------------------------------------------------------- Let University of Phoenix make 2004 your year. Evening, weekend or FlexNet® classes ? over 130 locations. Look into our programs and get the degree that gets you going! http://click.topica.com/caaciq1aVxieSa8wsBba/UOP ----------------------------------------------------------- CPEO's recently published "A Stakeholder's Guide to Munitions Response" is now available on line at http://cpeo.org/pubs/cpeo_stakeholders_uxo_guide.doc. The introductory paragraphs of this 35-page document are pasted below. LS *** It's one of America's largest environmental problems, but most people don't even think of it as an environmental issue. Tens of millions of acres of land and waterways are contaminated with unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded munitions, and explosive constituents and byproducts. "Military munitions response," in official jargon, refers to the investigation, remediation, disposal, and management of those substances. Munitions pose both explosive hazards and toxic risks. By design, military ranges and other installations that handle them were once situated in remote locations, but today average Americans are increasingly coming into contact with munitions and their constituents. According to the Defense Department, it could cost as little as $25 billion or as much as $200 billion to address that threat on land, and untold billions more to conduct munitions response at water ranges. The Department of Defense, which is responsible for the vast majority of munitions contamination, stumbled into the problem in 1983, when an old artillery round detonated in a San Diego's Tierrasanta neighborhood, killing two boys. The Army Corps of Engineers quickly established a program to deal with "ordnance and explosive wastes," as they were called at the time, but the program lacked the technology, resources, and leadership necessary to take on what turned out to be a national, multi-billion dollar challenge. Over the past twenty years, the Defense Department-prodded by citizens, regulatory agencies, and Congress-has gradually improved its technologies, procedures, and management of munitions response. Even as work continues to strengthen those areas, it clearly lacks the financial commitment to take on the enormity of the problem. Furthermore, the legal authority of environmental regulatory agencies to require cleanup or even investigation remains in dispute. While munitions contamination rarely attracts the full attention of the national news media, it remains a significant, and continuing issue in communities and regions where it is found-such as Adak (Alaska), Kaho'olawe (Hawaii), Fort Ord (California), the Lowry Bombing and Gunnery Range (Colorado), the Jefferson Proving Ground (Indiana), Camp Butner (North Carolina), Camp Edwards (Massachusetts), the Aberdeen Proving Ground (Maryland), Spring Valley (DC), and Vieques (Puerto Rico). The people who live, work, study, and exercise on or near military ranges, munitions burial sites, and contamination sites are playing a growing role in shaping the military's response. The Stakeholders' Guide to Munitions Response is designed both to document and to strengthen that role. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org Your free subscription is supported by today's sponsor: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Save up to 67% on Omaha Steaks + Get 6 FREE Burgers and a FREE Cutlery Set + Cutting Board! http://click.topica.com/caaclxSaVxieSa8wsBbf/OmahaSteaks ------------------------------------------------------------------- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CPEO: A DECADE OF SUCCESS. Your generous support will ensure that our important work on military and environmental issues will continue. Please consider one of our donation options. Thank you. http://www.groundspring.org/donate/index.cfm?ID=2086-0|721-0 | |
Prev by Date: Edwards AFB Technical Impracticability Next by Date: Re: Stakeholder's Guide to Munitions Response | |
Prev by Thread: Edwards AFB Technical Impracticability Next by Thread: Re: Stakeholder's Guide to Munitions Response |