From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 11 Jan 2005 07:07:06 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] NAS Perchlorate report news stories |
Panel: EPA hasn't justified need for perchlorate limit By Peter Eisler USA TODAY January 11, 2005 WASHINGTON ? A National Academy of Sciences panel says the Environmental Protection Agency hasn't justified the need for a virtual no-tolerance limit on pollution from perchlorate, a chemical in rocket fuel and military munitions that has fouled drinking water supplies nationwide. The panel's review aims to settle a high-stakes EPA dispute with the military and aerospace communities, which could face billions of dollars in cleanup costs if the agency strictly limits perchlorate pollution. The Pentagon pushed for the Academy review after an EPA study concluded that perchlorate levels in drinking water should be limited to 1 part per billion to ensure public safety. There currently is no federal limit on perchlorate pollution, though a few states are moving to set limits of less than 10 ppb in drinking water. ... For the entire article, see http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-01-10-percholate-epa_x.htm Science Panel Issues Report on Exposure to Pollutant By FELICITY BARRINGER New York Times January 11, 2005 ASHINGTON, Jan. 10 - In an eagerly awaited report on perchlorate, one of the most controversial unregulated toxic pollutants in the country's drinking water and food supplies, the National Academy of Sciences said Monday that people would be safe if exposed to daily doses 20 times those under consideration by the Environmental Protection Agency. Depending on how federal and state regulators interpret the academy's recommendation, the Defense Department, its contractors and other federal agencies responsible for contamination from perchlorate, a component of solid rocket fuel, could avoid cleanup costs of hundreds of millions of dollars. The environmental agency and the states of California and Massachusetts have already taken the initial steps in the regulatory process, with the E.P.A. and Massachusetts both suggesting a maximum safe level of one part per billion, and California setting a goal of six parts per billion. Thus far, no regulation on the maximum safe level of perchlorate in drinking water has been made final. ... For the entire article, see http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/11/politics/11report.html Health Standard for Perchlorate too High ERICA WERNER Associated Press (Kansas City Star) Posted on January 10, 2005 WASHINGTON - A panel of scientists concluded Monday that perchlorate, a toxic chemical used in rocket fuel and explosives, is safe for consumption at levels 20 times greater than the standard being considered by the Environmental Protection Agency. In a report expected to influence a final EPA regulation on the chemical, the National Academy of Sciences supported a level of contamination closer to that favored by the Pentagon, and not the more stringent rules sought by environmentalists and some Democrats. The study comes after years of disagreement over how dangerous it is for people to consume water tainted with perchlorate, a pervasive leftover of Cold War defense manufacturing that has been found in drinking water in 35 states. .. For the entire article, see http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/politics/10612044.htm U.S. tried to suppress pollutant study, group says By Maggie Fox Reuters January 10, 2005 WASHINGTON, Jan 10 (Reuters) - A new report from the National Academy of Sciences raises by 20 times the amount of rocket fuel pollution in drinking water considered "safe," but environmentalists on Monday accused the government of influencing the report's findings. The environmental group Natural Resources Defense Council challenged the report even before it was issued, saying the authors had been influenced by the Pentagon and defense contractors and it had evidence to prove it. The pollutant from rocket fuel, a chemical called perchlorate, can affect thyroid function. There are no federal limits on how much is safe but independent groups have said the chemical could affect developing babies. The Academy's National Research Council, which advises the government on scientific and environmental matters, was asked by the Department of Defense, NASA and other agencies to review evidence that perchlorate in drinking water or food crops was harmful and if so, how much was safe. .. For the entire article, see http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N10221751.htm Panel Says Perchlorate Is Safer Than Previously Advised by EPA By PETER WALDMAN THE WALL STREET JOURNAL January 10, 2005 A panel of the National Academy of Sciences said people can safely consume more perchlorate than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has advised, yet much less of the chemical than advocated by the U.S. Department of Defense. The two federal agencies have sparred for several years over the potential health dangers of perchlorate , the main ingredient in solid rocket fuel that the Pentagon and defense contractors have discharged into water supplies in 35 states. In a 192-page report issued Monday, the National Academies' National Research Council said people of all ages could safely drink roughly 20 parts per billion of perchlorate in drinking water. ... The entire article is available only to paid subscribers at http://www.wsj.com -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] NRDC charges White House and DOD manipulated NAS perchlorate study Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Enviros react to NAS perchlorate report | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] NAS Perchlorate report Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Enviros react to NAS perchlorate report |