From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 20 Jan 2005 19:46:12 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] perchlorate calculations |
Perchlorate report doesn't dispel controversy REBECCA RENNER Environmental Science & Technology Online News - Science News January 19, 2005 Perchlorate is not as hazardous as U.S. EPA scientists estimated, but it is more harmful than many perchlorate manufacturers have suggested, says a National Academy of Sciences (NAS) committee in a long-awaited report released on January 10. The safe dose recommended by the committee, 0.7 micrograms per kilogram of a person's body weight per day (µg/kg-day), is 23 times higher than EPA's draft reference dose but at least 7 times lower than perchlorate industry groups? recommendations. The report, however, is unlikely to dispel controversy about safe levels of perchlorate in drinking water because calculating such levels involves additional information about exposure sources as well as choices about whom to protect, according to Alan Roberson, regulatory affairs director at the American Water Works Association in Washington, D.C. Possible perchlorate standards vary according to food, drink, and body weight The U.S. National Academy of Sciences (NAS) has recommended a reference dose of 0.7 micrograms per kilogram per day. To convert this dose into a drinking-water standard, regulators will have to determine or estimate how much perchlorate exposure comes from the food and water a person consumes per day, based on their body weight. The U.S. EPA's default assumptions are a 70-kilogram male who drinks 2 liters of water per day and gets 80% of the dose through water, but regulators can use other numbers. California's proposed drinking-water standard of 6 pp. assumes that water contributes 60% of exposure. ... For the entire article, see http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2005/jan/science/rr_perchloratereport.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] EWG - "Second Thoughts on Perchlorate Study" and its coverage Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Indiana Ammo Plant's expensive insurance | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] EWG - "Second Thoughts on Perchlorate Study" and its coverage Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Indiana Ammo Plant's expensive insurance |