From: | marylia@earthlink.net (marylia) |
Date: | 18 Feb 2005 18:16:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Re: RE: DU, cleanup and a budget note |
Hi, just a quick thought for the day, triggered by the notation that the Army thinks it's too expensive to clean up all of the DU at the Jefferson Proving Ground. Most of us who live around Dept. of Energy sites (like me) or DoD sites, have heard that it is "too expensive" to clean up one or more contaminants (fill in the blank by listing the contaminant(s) from your site here). Yet, the Dept. of Energy fiscal year 2006 budget that just went to Congress has billions for one or another aspect of nuclear weapons development and "life extension", etc., etc. -- as it does every year. The DOE budget requests increased funds in 2006 for nuclear weapons. DOE environmental management, on the other hand, is taking a big hit nationally. (And, of course, the DoD budget request has many billions upon billions for weapons systems.) So, my question for the day is this -- how come my government always has "enough" money to develop weapons and never has "enough" money to clean up the mess it makes developing weapons? And, a bonus question: How come we let them get away with this line of reasoning when it comes to cleanup? Peace, Marylia Marylia Kelley Executive Director Tri-Valley CAREs (Communities Against a Radioactive Environment) 2582 Old First Street Livermore, CA USA 94551 <http://www.trivalleycares.org> - is our web site address. Please visit us there! (925) 443-7148 - is our phone (925) 443-0177 - is our fax _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] EPA Sets Reference Dose for Perchlorate Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Clam-shell-shocked in Delaware | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] EPA Sets Reference Dose for Perchlorate Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Clam-shell-shocked in Delaware |