From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 22 Feb 2005 18:35:53 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate "translation" draws criticism |
Health: EPA's Ruling On Perchlorate Draws Criticism By Peter Waldman The Wall Street Journal February 22, 2005 The Environmental Protection Agency, in a policy decision that may save the Pentagon and defense industry billions of dollars in cleanup costs, adopted a weakened version of the National Academy of Sciences' recommended "safe dose" for perchlorate exposure. In response, some scientists, environmentalists and members of Congress who are worried that the water contaminant poses a risk to infant-brain development, accused the Bush administration of meddling with the science to help the suspected polluters. Perchlorate, a main ingredient in solid-rocket fuel and other weapons systems, was discharged into soil and streams by the military and its suppliers throughout the Cold War, and has turned up in water supplies in 35 states. The current controversy concerns the EPA's adoption of a so-called reference dose for perchlorate, or the daily exposure level for the chemical deemed safe for the most sensitive subpopulations over a lifetime. This is the first step toward the possible setting of a legal water standard for perchlorate. On Friday, the EPA announced it is officially adopting the reference dose recommended last month by a panel of the National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council, which said adults can safely consume an equivalent of 24 parts per billion of perchlorate in drinking water. In 2002 the EPA proposed its own reference dose for perchlorate of one part per billion, which the agency says it is now discarding. But in an unusual ripple, the EPA, in translating the NRC's reference dose into a drinking-water limit, said it wasn't following the guidance for how to apply the panel's reference dose that was issued by the NRC panel's chairman, Richard Johnston of the University of Colorado. Dr. Johnston, in public comments last month and again in an interview Friday, stated that in order to translate the NRC reference dose into a drinking-water limit, it is necessary to adjust the NRC dose for an individual's body weight and water-consumption level -- in the same way dosages of medicines are routinely adjusted for particular patients' weights. ... For the entire article, go to http://www.wsj.com. A paid subscription is required. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Water system at Badger Ammo Plant Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate in Breast Milk | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Water system at Badger Ammo Plant Next by Thread: [Fwd: [CPEO-MEF] Perchlorate in Breast Milk] |