From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 1 Apr 2005 17:44:34 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Environment California criticizes reported state perchlorate decision |
Environment California For Immediate Release: April 1, 2005 California May Allow Rocket Fuel Pollution to Remain in Drinking Water Supplies of Millions Despite new data showing the presence of the rocket fuel chemical perchlorate in the milk of nursing mothers and widespread contamination of food, California Environmental Protection Agency will move forward with a final public health goal (PHG) for perchlorate that fails to protect newborn infants from perchlorate and may let the biggest polluters in the state off the hook. "We are absolutely appalled that the State will not protect our babies from rocket fuel contamination in our drinking water," stated Penny Newman, Executive Director for the Inland Valley-based Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ). "This public health goal does not protect public health. It protects polluters." The recommendation will be used by the Department of Health Services in setting a final cleanup standard for the contaminant in drinking water. According to a letter issued by state officials yesterday, the decision to move forward with a public health goal of 6 ppb does not incorporate recent findings of perchlorate in the milk of nursing mothers throughout the country and is six times weaker than a similar recommendation issued in Massachusetts last year. "The State is openly telling us that our babies don't count," said Jan Misquez, Campaign Director for the Inland Valley Perchlorate Task Force in San Bernardino. "They clearly stated that they did not consider the impacts on breast fed babies and have no plans to do so-this is truly policy setting by ignoring the scientific evidence available." A final standard set at six parts per billion may avert a legal requirement for Kerr McGee Corporation to fully cleanup contamination leaking into the Colorado River, which supplies water to 135 California cities and irrigates much of the nation's winter produce crop. A December Environmental Protection Agency reports lists the maximum level of perchlorate in the Colorado River at Parker Dam at 5.7 ppb, just under the new health recommendation. Federal regulators and community activists have described Kerr McGee's contamination of the Colorado River with perchlorate as the single largest pollution problem in the nation. "The bottom line is that rocket fuel has no place in our water supplies. Polluters put it there, they should get it out. All of it." stated Sujatha Jahagirdar, Clean Water Advocate for Environment California Research & Policy Center and co-author of the recent Center study, Perchlorate and Children's Health. "It seems a bit too coincidental that the suggested public health goal is just above the levels found in the Colorado River, relieving the polluters from having to clean up the contamination," said CCAEJ's Newman. Recent studies of lettuce and other crops that largely originate from regions irrigated with Colorado River water have shown an elevated concentration of the chemical in food. "By setting a level at 6ppb, we're guaranteeing that our food supply will be contaminated." According to a health studies conducted by state and federal regulators, and the National Academy of Sciences, at low levels, perchlorate can harm the thyroid gland. Deficiencies in hormones controlled by the thyroid gland are linked to problems in brain development that can lead to conditions such as attention deficit disorder, learning disabilities and decreased IQ. Massachusetts regulators have suggested one part per billion as a safer threshold to protect babies. When adjusted to protect infants and account for exposure through food, recent EPA and National Academy of Sciences studies point to the same. In addition to allowing contamination to continue to pollute the Colorado River, the public health goal issued today may lead to a cleanup standard that will let polluters in the Morgan Hill area off the hook for cleaning up 75 percent of the wells it has contaminated. "What we are talking about here is the brain development of our babies. Protecting them should be a top priority for every state official," concluded Jahagirdar. For the original press release, go to http://environmentcalifornia.org/envirocalif.asp?id2=16611&id3=CE -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: list.cpeo.org mailing list memberships reminder Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Activist leaves Cape Cod review team over perchlorate dispute | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Navy agrees to characterize Moffett Field (CA) hangar Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Activist leaves Cape Cod review team over perchlorate dispute |