From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 15 Apr 2005 19:24:11 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] New, Revised RRPI/Exemptions proposal from the Defense Department |
[On April 7, 2005, the Defense Department submitted to both Houses of Congress its proposed legislative language for the Defense Authorization Act of 2006. The paragraphs below are the Department's explanation of the latest incarnation of the Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative, known to its opponents as the Exemptions legislation. I will post the actual legislative language as separate messages. According to the cover letters, the proposals have been cleared by the Office of Management and Budget as representing a unified Executive Branch position. - LS] Sections 313 and 314 address application of the Clean Air Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) (also known as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) to military readiness activities. Air Quality: The section on air quality plans would clarify the application of the conformity provisions of the Clean Air Act to avoid unnecessarily restricting the flexibility of the Department of Defense (DoD), state, and federal regulators to accommodate military readiness into applicable air pollution control schemes. The section would maintain DoD's obligation to conform its military readiness activities to applicable State Implementation Plans, but would give DoD three years to demonstrate conformity. Under the requirements of current law, it is becoming increasingly difficult to base military aircraft near developed areas. Range Management: Subsection (a)(1) would exclude military munitions, including unexploded ordnance, and the constituents thereof from the definition of "solid waste" under the SWDA when DoD deposits such items on an operational range incident to normal use, and such items remain thereon. Subsection (a)(2) provides that the exclusion in subsection (a)(1) does not apply to certain listed activities or circumstances such as traditional waste management activities like burial or land-filling, migration off an operational range, or firing off range. Subsection (a)(2) additionally provides that the exclusion in subsection (a)(1) ceases to apply once the operational range on which the items were deposited ceases to be an operational range. Subsection (a)(3) explicitly preserves the authority of federal, state, interstate, and local regulatory authorities to determine when, after an operational range ceases to be an operational range, these items become a hazardous waste subject to the Act. Subsection (b)(1) would exclude from the definition of "release" under CERCLA the presence of military munitions, including unexploded ordnance, and the constituents thereof, that DoD deposited incidental to normal use on an operational range and that remain thereon. Subsection (b)(2) provides that the exclusion in subsection (b)(1) does not apply to certain listed activities or circumstances, such as migration off an operational range or firing off range. Subsection (b)(2) additionally provides that the exclusion in subsection (b)(1) ceases to apply once the operational range on which the items were deposited ceases to be an operational range. Subsection (b)(3) explicitly preserves the President's authority to address an imminent and substantial endangerment to the public health, welfare, or the environment under section 106(a) of CERCLA. Subsection (c) provides definitions of terms, including incorporating by reference terms already defined in title 10, United States Code. Subsection (d) reaffirms that the exclusions set forth in subsections (a)(1) and (b)(1) do not apply once the operational range ceases to be an operational range. Subsection (e) reaffirms the DoD's authority to protect the environment, safety, and health on operational ranges. As noted above and reiterated in subsection (d), this section would have no effect on the legal requirements applicable to military munitions, including unexploded ordnance, or the constituents thereof, once the range on which they were deposited ceases to be an operational range. These provisions would restrict the application of certain authorities under CERCLA and RCRA for covered munitions while those ranges remain operational. Application of those same authorities when the range ceases to be an operational range is not affected by these two provisions. Nor would this section place any restriction on the applicability of the Safe Drinking Water Act on or off of an operational range. Nothing in this section affects a private party's right of action against the United States or any of its agencies to recover costs expended in the clean up of military munitions and unexploded ordnance, and the constituents thereof, that are present on property formerly operated (directly or through a contractor) or formerly owned by the United States. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Puerto Rican bases Next by Date: Re: [CPEO-MEF] New, Revised RRPI/Exemptions proposal from the DefenseDepartment | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Puerto Rican bases Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-MEF] New, Revised RRPI/Exemptions proposal from the DefenseDepartment |