From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 25 Apr 2005 16:50:31 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] PEER critiques new Defense environmental directive |
For Immediate Release: April 14, 2005 Contact: Chas Offutt (202) 265-7337 PENTAGON PARES BACK ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES - New Policy Drops Cleanup and Resource Conservation Duties Washington, DC - In a significant policy shift, the Pentagon has sharply reduced its environmental duties, according to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). A new directive signed by outgoing Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz on March 19, 2005 confines Pentagon anti-pollution work only to activities that directly "sustain the national defense mission." This new "Department of Defense Directive" cancels a Clinton-era directive on "Environmental Security." The new Directive trims a listing of Pentagon policy elements by eliminating provisions for - * "Reducing risk to human health and the environment by identifying, evaluating, and where necessary, remediating contamination resulting from past DoD activities"; * "Protecting, preserving, and, when required, restoring, and enhancing the quality of the environment"; and * "Conserving, and restoring where necessary, the natural and cultural heritage represented on DoD installations within the United States." In an apparent concession to criticisms leveled when PEER posted a draft of the new policy in December, the final version was changed to add as policy "to protect DoD personnel from accidental death, injury or occupational illness" and "to protect the public from risk of death, injury, illness, or property damage because of DoD activities." "These changes show that protecting the public and even their own personnel from environmental threats is an afterthought," stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. "One additional change to the final policy is opening ?dialogue' on environmental issues, which is ironic coming in a document that was developed in secret in the utter absence of dialogue." The new policy also significantly cuts Pentagon compliance with anti-pollution rules by dropping requirements that it obey "regulations, Executive orders, binding international agreements" and other federal "environmental, safety, occupational health, explosives safety, fire and emergency services, and pest management policies." In its place, the Pentagon would pledge to only abide by "applicable law and DoD policy." In stripping away promises to improve or protect the environment, the new Directive instead says that the Pentagon "will evaluate all activities...and make prudent investments in initiatives that support mission accomplishment, enhance readiness, reduce future funding needs, prevent pollution, ensure cost effective compliance, and maximize the existing resource capability." "Despite having the worst pollution record on the planet, the Pentagon promises to self-regulate its environmental performance," added Ruch, pointing to the Pentagon's continuing efforts to exempt itself from an array of environmental laws. "This new policy says that Pentagon agencies will do only the minimum pollution prevention and clean-up as required by its logistical and facility management needs." Department of Defense directives define the agency's mission and responsibilities. By its terms, this Directive covers all "DoD operations, activities, and installations worldwide, including Government-owned/contractor-operated facilities." For the original press release, go to http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=512 For the full Defense Department directive, go to https://www.denix.osd.mil/ It's currently the third item down the page. -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Live shell missing from Ft. Ord (CA) range Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] IRF's first week | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Live shell missing from Ft. Ord (CA) range Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] IRF's first week |