From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 18 Jun 2005 01:28:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-military |
Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Debating perchlorate's toxicity |
Taking aim at water study By Matt King Gilroy Dispatch (CA) June 15, 2005 Gilroy - California?s public health goal for perchlorate could have doubled to 12 parts per billion had the state relied solely on the findings of a National Academies of Science report that will be used to set a federal drinking water standard, a California environmental official said Tuesday. Dr. George Alexeeff, a deputy director for the Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment, said his agency took a different view of the key study - the so-called Greer study - cited in the NAS report and derived a lower benchmark dose, which is used to measure risk exposure. The agency first set the health goal at 6 parts per billion last year and reconfirmed it in April after reviewing the NAS report that was published in January. The public health goal is important because polluters must clean up to state standards, even if federal standards are more relaxed. ... For the entire article, see http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/contentview.asp?c=161497 -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Military mailing list Military@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/military | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Hanford contamination "in the environment" Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Hills, Iowa perchlorate updates | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Hanford contamination "in the environment" Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Hills, Iowa perchlorate updates |