| From: | Emery Graham <egraham@dca.net> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 May 1999 11:05:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
| Subject: | Municipal Liability |
Brownfield to NPL Site - Need for Caution
Has anyone considered the process of implementing the
brownfield assessment process; the searching of the
historical record, deed and title searches, reviewing old
maps. The primary outcome from this process is the
discovery of likely candidates for more indepth
assessment and site testing for the presence of hazardous
materials that the historical research suggested might exist.
Another, in action, process that leads to using brownfield
assessment funds is the site development process that
accompanies economic and housing development projects.
In this case investors call for "due diligence" actions
inorder to reduce their potential liabilities and protect
their
investments. In both of these instances the newly
participating municipality usually has not taken the
structural and legal
precautions needed to protect the workers and the
financial interests of the taxpayers. In the final analysis if
the
municipality does something that triggers a major lawsuit
or exposes a major hazardous waste liability, most likely
the reserve accounts will not be able to finance the
costs of a major problem. This typically will be addressed by
insurance and/or capital funds. In any event the "good
faith and credit" of the municipality, which is based on its
ability to impose taxes on its citizens, is the fall back
source of financing.
I suspect that some municipalities have addressed this
problem already and I'd like to hear from anyone who can
speak from experience. I hope no municipality is taken by
surprise in these matters.
| |
|
Prev by Date: Learning and Action Next by Date: EPA's Brownfields Definition | |
|
Prev by Thread: RE: Learning and Action Next by Thread: EPA's Brownfields Definition | |