| From: | "Gibbons, Frank W." <GIBBONS@ohm.com> |
| Date: | 18 Aug 1998 10:53:08 |
| Reply: | cpeo-military |
| Subject: | Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) |
IN REPLY TO STEVEN POLLACK: 1)I AGREE THAT DILUTION TO BELOW REGULATORY STANDARDS IS NOT AN EFFECTIVE CLEANUP STRATEGY SINCE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF CONTAMINANTS DOES NOT DECREASE; HOWEVER, NA IS NOT BASED ON DILUTION BUT RATHER DESTRUCTION OF THE TOXINS BY THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT; 2)CLEANUP STANDARDS ARE ALREADY BEING INDIRECTLY SET BY PUBLIC POLICY IN THAT CONGRESS FOR THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS HAS NOT BEEN WILLING TO FUND DOD ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP AT GREATER THAN $2 BILLION WHICH IS DOWN ABOUT 4-6% FROM THE PEAK IN 1994. FRANK GIBBONS | |
References
| |
|
Prev by Date: Natural Attenuation (NA) Next by Date: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) | |
|
Prev by Thread: Natural Attenuation (NA) Next by Thread: Re: Natural Attenuation (NA) | |