| From: | CPEO Moderator <cpeo@cpeo.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:54:59 -0800 (PST) |
| Reply: | cpeo-military |
| Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Picantinny: Committed to Cleanup? |
[This message was posted to the listserve by Michael Glaab,
<michaelglaab@worldnet.att.net>. Michael asked us to make it clear that
this is his own opinion, not necessarily that of the Picatinny Arsenal
Environmental Restoration Advisory Board.]
Lenny:
Your E-mail concerning the Defense Department's committment to
environmental remediation was very interesting and sobering.
Unfortunately I cannot say with conviction that I believe that the
DEFENSE DEPARTMENT is in fact COMMITTED TO CLEANUP.
With respect to Picatinny Arsenal, it is unclear to me just which
agency is most responsible for the deviation from what appears to
be the more environmentally responsible course.
The precedent setting challenge to the state of New Jersey's cleanup
standards appears to have been precipitated by a reevaluation conducted
by the USACHPPM (US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive
Medicine).
Prior to their reevaluation, a remediation action for site 20/24 had
already been agreed upon and funded. This action initially consisted of
undertaking a removal action of contaminated soils. Principal
contaminant appears to be PCB. However, there is also a considerable
presence of such diverse substances as lead, beryllium, barium, cobalt,
arsenic, dioxins - and interestingly enough the strontium-90 and
Cesium-137 isotopes. Apparently the strontium-90 isotope is in
insufficient quantities to merit it being considered a COPEC (chemical
of potential ecological concern). This is very fortunate
considering the following quote:
"One of the most dangerous radioactive isotopes
produced when a nuclear bomb explodes is
strontium-90..."
Chemical Principles - Masterton, Slowinski, 3rd. edition
Assuming I recollect correctly, the strontium-90 is allegedly derived
from helicopter gauges/instrumentation.
The Environmental Office at Picatinny Arsenal had asked for and received
the RAB's approval of the removal action. However after Mr. Lawrence
Tannenbaum, a (Biologist) Risk Assessor in the Environmental Health Risk
Assessment and Risk Communication Program of USACHPPM, issued his (April
22, 1998) report the removal action was postponed and eventually
cancelled. The RAB was informed that the earlier promulgated cleanup
standards were inappropriate and also that the mathematical formulae
which were used to compute risk were inapplicable and that they would
not be used. The RAB was then asked to approve the new cleanup standards
which were less restrictive than those of the state (NJ) and apparently
of the EPA. It was argued that the state legislature had not properly
promulgated its cleanup standards and that therefore the army was not
required to conform to them. The RAB declined to approve the less
restrictive standards.
The RAB then asked for an appraisal from the US Dept. of Health and
Human Services - Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry Div. of Health Assessment and Consultation. It was
forthcoming and it concerns the REVISIONS to the exposure and toxicity
assumptions (i.e. cleanup standards, averaging the degree of
contamination over a larger area, etc.) cited in the "Addendum to the
Phase I Remedial Investigation Human Health Assessment for Picatinny
Arsenal" which resulted from the USACHPPM report:
"HEALTH CONSULTATION - Review of Picatinny
Arsenal PCB Health Risk Assessment Assumption -
Picatinny Arsenal
Dover, Morris County, New Jersey
CERCLIS NO. NJ3210020704
January 21, 1999"
Some statements of note in the ATSDR document
are, on page 11:
a. "ATSDR does not concur with the assumptions
made when intermediate or acute exposures
and noncancer health risks are considered. The
PCBs in soil north and southwest of the gravel
pad in the western half of the grid area pose a
potential public health hazard ..."
b. "No, the conclusion of 'no further action' is not
appropriate. The PCBs in soil north and
southwest of the gravel pad in the western half
of the grid area pose a potential public health
hazard on the basis of risk for immune and
developmental effects."
Eventually the RAB decided to ask its local federal legislators to
intercede. Our local Congressman, Rodney Frelinghuysen, publicly
supported adherance to the state cleanup standards. To my knowledge, our
Senators Lautenberg and Torricelli have done nothing remotely similar.
Shortly after this the EPA representative announced that he had been
informed that his superiors had cited to him an internal memo which they
interpreted such that the EPA would no longer oppose conformance to the
less restrictive standards. Needless to say, this was
not helpful with the local media.
Shortly after this Sen. Torricelli sent a representative to one of our
RAB meetings who, (Mr. Joe Tyrrell) citing the ATSDR concerns above,
actually seemed to recommend "Capping" as an immediate action intended
to avoid a short term public health hazard. He stated to the RAB that he
would intercede with the state and federal authorities to facilitate the
speedy approval and implementation of a
"Capping" action and implied that there would then be real remedial
followup action. Privately, he informed me that he intended that the
contaminated soils even be first "Capped" and then later excavated as
necessary. However, my contacts with environmental authorities inform me
that this would be atypical and that they normally do not approve such
actions. Since then neither Mr. Tyrrell nor anyone from Sen.
Torricelli's office has been available. Telephone calls are not even
returned.
Now the Army asserts that "Capping" a "Natural Attenuation," with as
yet undefined "engineering/institutional" controls, will be adequate to
achieve the less restrictive cleanup levels.
Michael Glaab
Citizen Co-chairman PAERAB
You can find archived listserve messages on the CPEO website at
http://www.cpeo.org/lists/index.html.
If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to:
cpeo-military-subscribe@igc.topica.com
_______________________________________________________
Follow the U.S. presidential race on our Politics list!
http://www.topica.com/lists/politics
| |
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Clinton Orders on Vieques Threaten Environment, Democracy. Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Fort Totten "Gift" | |
|
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Clinton Orders on Vieques Threaten Environment, Democracy. Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Fort Totten "Gift" | |