| From: | Lenny Siegel <lennysiegel@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:39:18 -0800 (PST) |
| Reply: | cpeo-military |
| Subject: | [CPEO-MEF] Okinawa (Japan) Dugong decision |
[I find interesting here the extra-territorial applicability of U.S.
laws. - LS]
For Immediate Release, January 24, 2008
Center for Biological Diversity
Federal Judge Rules Against U.S. Defense Department Plans for
Airbase in Habitat of Okinawa Dugong;
Species Considered Cultural Icon by Okinawan People
SAN FRANCISCO - Judge Marilyn Hall Patel today issued a final ruling in
Okinawa Dugong v. Gates, N.D.Cal., C-03-4350, finding the Department of
Defense in violation of the National Historic Preservation Act and
requiring it to consider impacts of a new airbase on the endangered
Okinawa dugong in order to avoid or mitigate any harm.
Local communities and conservationists are concerned that a
1.5-mile-long runway, proposed to be built over seagrass beds, would
destroy the remaining habitat of the endangered Okinawa dugong, a
cultural icon of the Okinawan people.
The lawsuit sought to compel the U.S. Department of Defense to comply
with the National Historic Preservation Act by conducting a complete
public assessment of the impacts of the proposed project on the dugong -
a relative of the manatee sometimes known as "sea cows" - so that
actions could be taken to avoid or mitigate any adverse affects. The
National Historic Preservation Act requires agencies of the U.S.
government to consider the impacts on cultural and historic resources in
other nations when undertaking activities outside the United States.
The legal wrangling began in September 2003 when members of the local
Okinawan community joined with an international coalition of
conservation groups to file suit in U.S. district court on behalf of the
dugong. In March 2005, Judge Patel denied a motion by the Department of
Defense to dismiss the lawsuit and rejected the government's argument
that Japanese cultural properties like the dugong do not merit
protection under the law.
In today's ruling, Judge Patel said:
"The current record contains no evidence that a single official
from the DOD with responsibility for the FRF [Futenma Replacement
Facility] has considered or assessed the available information on the
dugong or the effects of the FRF." (p. 37)
"The court is troubled that the 2006 Roadmap embodying final plans
for the construction of the FRF has received the highest levels of
approvals from the U.S. Secretaries of Defense and State. Yet, the
impacts of the FRF on the dugong are currently not well-understood....
Satisfaction of defendants’ obligations under section 402
[(extraterritorial provision of the) National Historic Preservation
Act], therefore, cannot be postponed until the eve of construction when
defendants have made irreversible commitments making additional review
futile or consideration of alternatives impossible." (p.43)
In her 46-page decision, Judge Patel reaffirmed her 2005 decision that
the endangered dugong, listed on Japan's register of protected cultural
properties, is entitled to protection under the U.S.'s National Historic
Preservation Act. She also found that the Department of Defense's
involvement in the plan to construct a new military base is a "federal
undertaking" that may directly harm the dugong, and so is subject to the
requirements of the statute. She held that the department's failure to
produce, gather, and consider information about the effects of the new
base on the Okinawa dugong, for the purpose of determining whether
protective measures are necessary, constitutes a violation of the law.
"This is a significant victory for the people of Okinawa concerned with
the preservation of their cultural heritage," commented Sarah Burt of
Earthjustice, who is representing plaintiffs in the lawsuit. "With this
ruling, Judge Patel has made clear that the Department of Defense has an
obligation to take a serious look at the impacts of its actions overseas
to avoid causing irrevocable harm to the cultural heritage of another
nation. This ruling will ensure that the DOD affords the dugong the
protection it deserves."
Peter Galvin, conservation director at the Center for Biological
Diversity, said: "The U.S. airbase expansion at Henoko Bay would involve
filling in large areas of critical ocean habitat. It would destroy some
of the last remaining habitat for the Okinawa dugong. We are hopeful
that the court-ordered review and public airing of the impacts of the
project will cause the U.S. and Japanese governments to halt the base
expansion plans and avoid driving the Okinawa dugong further toward
extinction."
Okinawa Dugong: A Japanese "Natural Monument"
The dugong is a large sea mammal related to the manatee and the extinct
Steller's sea cow. Its northernmost range is among the coral reefs off
Okinawa, Japan. The Okinawa dugong has been listed by the government of
Japan since 1955 as a "Natural Monument" under Japan's Cultural
Properties Protection Law. On August 6, 2007, the Japanese Ministry of
Environment listed the Okinawa dugong as "critically endangered" - the
most severely threatened category before "extinct." The animal has long
been revered by native Okinawans as a significant part of their culture
and history, celebrated as "sirens" or "mermaids" who bring friendly
warnings of tsunamis.
U.S. plaintiffs in this case were the Center for Biological Diversity
and the Turtle Island Restoration Network. They were joined by Japanese
groups Save the Dugong Foundation, Committee Against Heliport
Construction, and Japan Environmental Lawyers Federation. Earthjustice
represented all the plaintiffs.
Read the decision here:
http://www.earthjustice.org/library/legal_docs/dugong-decision-12408.pdf
--
Lenny Siegel
Executive Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight
a project of the Pacific Studies Center
278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041
Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545
Fax: 650/961-8918
<lsiegel@cpeo.org>
http://www.cpeo.org
_______________________________________________
Military mailing list
Military@lists.cpeo.org
http://lists.cpeo.org/listinfo.cgi/military-cpeo.org
| |
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Schwarzenegger and Rocketdyne (CA) Next by Date: [CPEO-MEF] Congressman questions Navy clean up of Vieques | |
|
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Schwarzenegger and Rocketdyne (CA) Next by Thread: [CPEO-MEF] Congressman questions Navy clean up of Vieques | |