From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> (by way of "cpeo@cpeo.org" <cpeo@cpeo.org>) |
Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 1999 10:02:17 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Lead Programs |
LEAD PROGRAMS NEED TO TARGET THE PROBLEM The January, 1999 General Accounting Office (GAO) report on lead ("Lead Poisoning: Federal Health Care Programs Are Not Effectively Reaching At-Risk Children," GAO/HEHS-99-18) succinctly describes the national lead problem. It points out that regulatory action, such as the outlawing of lead as a gasoline additive, have reduced lead exposures. As the title suggests, the report focuses on the shortcomings of federally funded health programs in addressing lead-poisoned children. Unfortunately, it doesn't go the next step. It ignores the overarching weakness of the American approach to a widespread, well recognized public health problem. The U.S. has no comprehensive lead strategy. Instead of targeting public and environmental health measures to protect at-risk children, it backs into lead protection from a variety of statutes and programs. GAO reports, "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 890,000 children aged 1 through 5 in the United States have blood lead levels associated with harmful effects on their ability to learn. Lead poisoning has long been considered to be the most serious environmental health threat to children in the United States." The testing of blood for high levels of lead is considered the "best screening method to identify harmful conditions," since the many typical symptoms, such as learning disabilities and hyperactivity, are difficult to pinpoint. On the positive side, past environmental controls have made an enormous difference: "Between the late 1970s and early 1990s, the prevalence of U.S. children aged 1 through 5 who had elevated blood levels dropped from 88 percent to 4.4. percent. HHS [the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] and others consider the decline in blood lead levels, associated with regulatory and voluntary bans on the use of lead in gasoline, household paint, food and drink cans, and plumbing systems, to be a major achievement." However, "the risk for lead exposure remains disproportionately high for some groups, including children who are poor, non-Hispanic blacks, or Mexican American or are living in large metropolitan areas or in older housing." GAO found that federal health care programs, including those serving populations which have a high share of lead poisoning, are not adequately responding. Preventive care is weak. Treatment and follow-up have substantial problems. Less than one in five children (aged 1 to 5) targeted by three federal health care programs are screened for blood-lead levels. Unlike many other environmental health problems, lead-poisoning has a huge, undeniable impact. Researchers and policy-makers know a great deal about whom is impacted, and why. Doctors and other health professionals know how to counter the harmful effects of lead. But government agencies and programs - federal, state, tribal, and local - are not getting the job done. Many people are trying, but the regulatory system fragments both controls and cleanup, based upon the ownership and nature of the source; health programs lack the funds to treat children should screening identify the real caseload. Researchers know where the problem lies. If all government programs and rules dealing with lead contamination and children were combined, or at least coordinated, to target known problems, a lot more could be achieved without substantial increases in resources allocated. GAO suggests a number of piecemeal reforms to improve the situation, but the country deserves a comprehensive strategy instead. (Singles copies of GAO reports are available for free by calling 202/512-6000 or may be downloaded from http://www.gao.gov.) Lenny Siegel -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org (PLEASE NOTE THAT WE ARE PHASING OUT MY OLD E-MAIL ADDRESS: lsiegel@igc.org) http://www.cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Boston Breakfast Next by Date: Re: Tax the Subsidies and Gentrification | |
Prev by Thread: Boston Breakfast Next by Thread: New Member Interests |