From: | "Gillon, Peter" <GillonP@gtlaw.com> |
Date: | Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:40:27 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | RE: Definition of Brownfields Question on HUD Chat |
Here's a question. Why should EPA's NPL site redevelopment initiative focus only on NPL sites that are newly listed or not yet subject to a final Record of Decision? What about the other 1400 sites, many of which are perfect for redevelopment but are impaired by remedies and institutional controls that will prevent redevelopment? -----Original Message----- From: Lenny Siegel [mailto:lsiegel@cpeo.org] Sent: Monday, March 08, 1999 6:57 PM To: cpeo-brownfields@igc.org Subject: Re: Definition of Brownfields Question on HUD Chat For a long time, regulatory agencies, including EPA, dealt with hazardous waste sites without thinking much about their future use. This made most sense of very polluted sites associated with hazardous waste disposal. The thrust of the Brownfields Initiative, as well as US EPA's more recent focus on Recycling Superfund Sites, is to optimize the future use of hazardous waste sites. In this way, Brownfields are a subset of hazardous waste sites. Lenny -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 222B View St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/968-1126 lsiegel@cpeo.org (PLEASE NOTE THAT WE ARE PHASING OUT MY OLD E-MAIL ADDRESS: lsiegel@igc.org) http://www.cpeo.org | |
Prev by Date: Re: Definition of Brownfields Question on HUD Chat Next by Date: NACCHO Public Health Principles and Guidance for BF | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Definition of Brownfields Question on HUD Chat Next by Thread: NACCHO Public Health Principles and Guidance for BF |