From: | Tony Chenhansa <tonyc@cpeo.org> |
Date: | Wed, 17 Mar 1999 17:13:15 -0800 (PST) |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | WY State Brownfields Bill Becomes Law w/o Governor's Signature |
"Brownfields Bill Becomes Law Without Governor's Signature" Press Release Office of the Governer Jim Geringer For Release: March 3, 1999 For the full press release go to: http://www.state.wy.us/governor/press_releases/1999/march_1999/brown.html I was unsuccessful in trying to find additional info about the bill itself. The following is an excerpt of the press release. The governor says he cannot give his full support of the bill, which doesn't become law until July 1, 2001. The main concern is whether or not the new law will conflict with federal environmental regulations. He hopes the state legislature can address the concerns he has listed before it becomes law in 2001. "... My specific areas of concern for the Legislature to consider are as follows: Water quality - The protection of groundwater is usually the most difficult issue at these sites. This issue must be dealt with as a top priority. Innocent neighbors - While one amendment helped in defining that an innocent adjacent landowner has certain rights, we have not fully protected those parties, particularly from migrating contamination. Specific zoning requirements - While primary authority resides with local government, the Act should be more specific on zoning that would protect public health. The Act also lacks an enforcement mechanism for whatever zoning is adopted. Restrictions on properties with no responsible party - While the bill protects the innocent owner from enforcement by DEQ, we must consider restrictions on the use of the land if it is not cleaned up. For instance, using a site with heavy metal contamination in the soils for a day care facility would not be acceptable. State primacy - The innocent landowner provisions must be consistent with federal requirements for owner liability. The above are my primary concerns. In addition, the following should also be considered: Incentives - The Act speaks of incentives. However, neither DEQ nor the EQC have authority to generate incentives. Any incentives must be defined in terms of performance and eligibility expectations. Orphan fund - Determine the feasibility of establishing an orphan site fund to address those sites with no responsible party. Definitions - Neither hazardous waste site nor solid waste site is defined. I will urge all concerned parties to reach consensus on a remedy for the above concerns. I trust that my approach will provoke the necessity that becomes the mother of correction. " -- [EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY: CPEO'S PHONE NUMBER HAS CHANGED TO 415-405-7751. OUR FAX NUMBER IS STILL THE SAME] Tony Chenhansa, Program Coordinator Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO) 425 Market Street 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105 ph: 415-405-7751 fx: 415-904-7765 e-mail: tonyc@cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org A program of the San Francisco Urban Institute | |
Prev by Date: Re: Brownfields, lotteries and equity Next by Date: More info on WY Brownfields Bill | |
Prev by Thread: Re: Brownfields, lotteries and equity Next by Thread: More info on WY Brownfields Bill |