From: | StellaVB@aol.com |
Date: | 23 Mar 2001 18:11:35 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] The Role of Local Governments in Long-Term Stewardship |
I just read the e-mail regarding the aforementioned subject matter. My concerns revolve around any site that is contaminated with chemicals. The suggestions for the study, like 'DOE, EPA, state, local and tribal local governments work together to employe the most effective long-term stewardship strategies' or that 'local governments have the legal authority to implement many legal controls that can be used to protect human health and the environment, more effective cooperation between the DOE and local governments is needed', sounds good but my question is how is this going to be done? I've worked with the Clark County local government on the Camp Bonneville issues and the main concern always revolves around money. The military will say 'we have no cleanup money', if I read this right, DOE is saying they have no cleanup money and this is what local governments are also saying. I could pose the question, 'where is all the taxpayers money going' but that would open up a whole other discussion/debate/argument! :) Beyond the issue of money (Clark County couldn't even afford 'security measures' around Camp Bonnevill! e's 3800 acres and neither could the Army and this had nothing to do with cleanup measures!) how does local government add to their already overworked caseload in terms of total understanding the hazards of these sites, the extreme severity of harm they pose and emergency procedures in a timely manner? Anyone who reads these types of listservers knows the response to emergency issues are not exactly a top priority on these sites once the site is turned over to a new owner or the original owner is trying to sell it off. I don't mean to put a damper on these types of studies but it seems regardless of the 'entity' taking control or giving control, money is the number #1 and everyone 'screams' we do not have enough. The other issue surrounds the seriousness of these sites in regards to the health and safety of the public and environment. The entities who are turning over these properties understand this quite well. It is not reasonable to expect the new owners to begin to comprehend this! Take Care, Stella Bourassa ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To read CPEO's archived Brownfields messages visit http://www.cpeo.org/lists/brownfields If this email has been forwarded to you and you'd like to subscribe, please send a message to cpeo-brownfields-subscribe@igc.topica.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ____________________________________________________________ T O P I C A -- Learn More. Surf Less. Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Topics You Choose. http://www.topica.com/partner/tag01 | |
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] "LA Railyard to become State Park" Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Emeryville Scores Important Victory in Brownfield Redevelopment Leg | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] "LA Railyard to become State Park" Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Emeryville Scores Important Victory in Brownfield Redevelopment Leg |