From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 2 Feb 2005 00:18:42 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Vapor Intrusion and Redevelopment |
[The article linked below provides an informative, provocative alternative to my own perspective about how state regulators should address vapor intrusion issues, particularly at redevelopment sites. - LS] Evaluating the Potential for Vapor Intrusion Impacts to Indoor Air: New York State DEC Issues New Draft Policy by Kenneth S. Kamlet and Jesse Hiney This article examines New York state's draft policy focusing on vapor intrusion issues that was issued in November 2004. Although the authors commend the state for its efforts in issuing the draft policy, they believe the policy fails to address some key issues that must be considered if the policy is to be successful. Furthermore, the authors particularly are concerned about the potential chilling effect the policy might have on the redevelopment of brownfields properties in New York if the state agencies fail to address the issues identified in this article. http://www.ny-brownfields.com/PDF_Files/Final_Art_012005.pdf -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields |
Follow-Ups
|
Prev by Date: [CPEO-BIF] California's Vapor Intrusion Guidance Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Cleanup goals adjusted in Hopewell Junction (NY) | |
Prev by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] California's Vapor Intrusion Guidance Next by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor Intrusion and Redevelopment |