From: | Bruce-Sean Reshen <reshen@mindspring.com> |
Date: | 13 Feb 2005 21:55:10 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | Re: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10 |
Thanks Larry for the on target example. I think, though, the issue is not simply that the existing regulations did not require addressing VI issues at legacy sites (sites closed in the distant past), but that VI issues were not addressed by anyone (buyers, sellers, developers and regulators) at these sites. While I am not suggesting that we not address those issues today, I am suggesting that it not be solely the financial responsibility of the innocent developer. LSchnapf@aol.com wrote: > Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain) > Encoding: 7bit _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
References
| |
Prev by Date: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10 Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] Perkasie (PA) TCE investigation | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10 Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] Vapor Intrusion and Redevelopment (Larry Schnapf... and others) |