From: | Lenny Siegel <lsiegel@cpeo.org> |
Date: | 14 Feb 2005 22:29:01 -0000 |
Reply: | cpeo-brownfields |
Subject: | [CPEO-BIF] Rep. Hinchey calls for protective TCE standard in New York |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Office of Congressman Maurice Hinchey February 14, 2005 Hinchey Calls On NY Dept. of Health To Strengthen TCE Guidelines Says Endicott & Ithaca Residents Cannot Afford To Wait Any Longer For Current Standards To Be Studied Endicott, NY - Deeply concerned that the current state and federal guidelines regulating trichloroethylene (TCE) are too weak to protect the residents of Endicott and Ithaca from health risks, Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) today called on the New York State Department of Health to greatly strengthen its guidelines on the toxin for indoor air in residences. "It is my strong belief, supported by a growing body of scientific research, that this chemical is indeed much more dangerous than previously thought," Hinchey wrote to New York State Department of Health Commissioner Antonia Novella. "I am greatly concerned that the current guideline permits unacceptable exposure risks for my constituents, particularly those living or working in areas of Endicott and Ithaca where TCE has been detected in indoor air." TCE is widely recognized as a probable carcinogen, having been identified in numerous studies to be a cause of cancer. Hinchey noted that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) scientists had proposed four years ago to greatly strengthen TCE guidelines in a draft assessment report. The congressman also pointed out that earlier this month, EPA officials decided to significantly strengthen the TCE standards in East Fishkill -- an area that has a much lower population concentration than Endicott or Ithaca. Given the fact that stronger TCE guidelines have been discussed, and in some place enacted, Hinchey said he feels that New York State's Department of Health must act now to protect the residents of Endicott and Ithaca. "Frankly, I am not content to wait indefinitely while this matter is studied. The people of Endicott, Ithaca, and other places where TCE has been detected at current actionable levels deserve quicker action and it is unconscionable that they are not getting it. Your agency is in a position to act," Hinchey wrote in his letter to Novella. Hinchey's letter was directed to the New York State Department of Health because the State, rather than EPA, is leading remediation efforts in Endicott and Ithaca. ### NOTE: Congressman Hinchey's Letter to Commissioner Novello is as follows: February 14, 2005 The Honorable Antonia C. Novello, M.D. Commissioner New York State Department of Health Corning Tower Empire State Plaza Albany, NY 12237 Dear Dr. Novello: I am writing to urge the New York State Department of Health to reexamine the air guideline it has established for long-term exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE). It is my strong belief, supported by a growing body of scientific research, that this chemical is indeed much more dangerous than previously thought. I am greatly concerned that the current guideline permits unacceptable exposure risks for my constituents, particularly those living or working in areas of Endicott and Ithaca where TCE has been detected in indoor air. While TCE is widely recognized as a probable carcinogen and has been linked to cancer growth in laboratory animals, a 2001 draft risk assessment prepared by the US Environmental Protection Agency found TCE to be highly likely to cause cancer in humans. The draft assessment also found TCE to be up to 65 times more toxic than previously believed and recommended dramatic reductions in air and groundwater clean-up standards and guidelines. EPA's present guideline sets a criteria range of 1 to 10 ug/m3 for indoor air, however the Agency's 2001 draft TCE air inhalation guideline suggested levels as low as .017 ug/m3. These numbers attempt to calculate the level at which one's lifetime cancer risk falls within the risk range of 1/1,000,000 and 1/10,000. Obviously there is a wide gap between what EPA and state agencies like NYS DOH currently use and what EPA scientists proposed some four years ago. EPA's draft assessment remains under review by the National Academies of Sciences. Frankly, I am not content to wait indefinitely while this matter is studied. The people of Endicott, Ithaca, and other places where TCE has been detected at current actionable levels deserve quicker action and it is unconscionable that they are not getting it. Your agency is in a position to act. At the NYS Assembly Hearing in Endicott last November, Dr. Nancy Kim, indicated that your agency is committed to a peer review process of the NYS DOH 5ug/m3 guideline established in 2003. I am not aware of the status of this review process, but it is my hope that it is inclusive of the latest research on exposure levels and that you are consulting the scientists involved in EPA's 2001 draft assessment. Earlier this month, a decision was made by EPA Region II to pursue a goal for TCE air concentration of .38ug/m3 in remediation work underway in East Fishkill. For those who have been advocating for more stringent standards, this news is most welcomed. It was also the right thing to do based on what we know today about TCE. For the sake of those whose health is dependent on action by regulatory agencies like NYSDOH, I urge you to revise your evaluation of the health risk associated with TCE and lower the present guideline. Best regards. Sincerely, Maurice D. Hinchey For the original press release, see http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/ny22_hinchey/morenews/021405nysdohtceletter.html -- Lenny Siegel Director, Center for Public Environmental Oversight c/o PSC, 278-A Hope St., Mountain View, CA 94041 Voice: 650/961-8918 or 650/969-1545 Fax: 650/961-8918 <lsiegel@cpeo.org> http://www.cpeo.org _______________________________________________ Brownfields mailing list Brownfields@list.cpeo.org http://www.cpeo.org/mailman/listinfo/brownfields | |
Prev by Date: RE: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10 - clarification Next by Date: [CPEO-BIF] South Bend plans ahead | |
Prev by Thread: Re: [CPEO-BIF] Re: Brownfields Digest, Vol 6, Issue 10 - clarification Next by Thread: [CPEO-BIF] South Bend plans ahead |